Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorEndara, M-J
dc.contributor.authorColey, PD
dc.contributor.authorWiggins, NL
dc.contributor.authorForrister, DL
dc.contributor.authorYounkin, GC
dc.contributor.authorNicholls, JA
dc.contributor.authorPennington, RT
dc.contributor.authorDexter, KG
dc.contributor.authorKidner, CA
dc.contributor.authorStone, GN
dc.contributor.authorKursar, TA
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-30T14:41:36Z
dc.date.issued2018-02-13
dc.description.abstractThe need for species identification and taxonomic discovery has led to the development of innovative technologies for large‐scale plant identification. DNA barcoding has been useful, but fails to distinguish among many species in species‐rich plant genera, particularly in tropical regions. Here, we show that chemical fingerprinting, or ‘chemocoding’, has great potential for plant identification in challenging tropical biomes. Using untargeted metabolomics in combination with multivariate analysis, we constructed species‐level fingerprints, which we define as chemocoding. We evaluated the utility of chemocoding with species that were defined morphologically and subject to next‐generation DNA sequencing in the diverse and recently radiated neotropical genus Inga (Leguminosae), both at single study sites and across broad geographic scales. Our results show that chemocoding is a robust method for distinguishing morphologically similar species at a single site and for identifying widespread species across continental‐scale ranges. Given that species are the fundamental unit of analysis for conservation and biodiversity research, the development of accurate identification methods is essential. We suggest that chemocoding will be a valuable additional source of data for a quick identification of plants, especially for groups where other methods fall short.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 218, pp. 847 - 858en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/nph.15020
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/34944
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherWiley for New Phytologist Trusten_GB
dc.rights.embargoreasonUnder embargo until 13 February 2019 in compliance with publisher policy
dc.rights© 2018 The Authors. New Phytologist © 2018 New Phytologist Trusten_GB
dc.subjectchemocodingen_GB
dc.subjectIngaen_GB
dc.subjectmetabolomicsen_GB
dc.subjectspecies identificationen_GB
dc.subjecttropical forestsen_GB
dc.titleChemocoding as an identification tool where morphological- and DNA-based methods fall short: Inga as a case studyen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2018-11-30T14:41:36Z
dc.identifier.issn0028-646X
dc.descriptionThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Wiley via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.identifier.journalNew Phytologisten_GB
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserveden_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2018-01-04
rioxxterms.funderSecretaría Nacional de Educación Superior, Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación del Ecuador (SENESCYT)
rioxxterms.funderNational Science Foundation.
rioxxterms.funderDIMENSIONS of Biodiversity
rioxxterms.funderNouragues Travel Grants Program
rioxxterms.funderCNRS
rioxxterms.identifier.projectDEB‐0640630
rioxxterms.identifier.projectDEB‐1135733
rioxxterms.versionAMen_GB
rioxxterms.typeBooken_GB
refterms.dateFCD2018-11-30T14:39:46Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.dateFOA2018-11-30T14:42:57Z


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record