Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSaunders, CL
dc.contributor.authorAbel, GA
dc.contributor.authorLyratzopoulos, G
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-08T10:23:17Z
dc.date.issued2014-01-03
dc.description.abstractObjective: To explore why patients with cancer treated by London hospitals report worse experiences of care compared with those treated in other English regions. Design: Secondary analysis of the 2011/2012 National Cancer Patient Experience Survey (n=69 086). Setting and participants: Patients with cancer treated by the English National Health Service (NHS) hospitals. Main outcome measures: 64 patient experience measures covering all aspects of cancer care (prediagnosis to discharge). Methods: Using mixed effects logistic regression, we explored whether poorer scores in London hospitals could be explained by patient case-mix (age, gender, ethnicity and cancer type). Because patients referred to tertiary centres and/or with complex medical problems may report more critical experiences, we also explored whether the experiences reported in London may reflect higher concentration of teaching hospitals in the capital. Finally, using the data from the (general) Adult Inpatients Survey, we explored whether the extent of poorer experience reported by London patients was similar for respondents to either survey. Results: For 52/64 questions, there was evidence of poorer experience in London, with the percentage of patients reporting a positive experience being lower compared with the rest of England by a median of 3.7% (IQR 2.5-5.4%). After case-mix adjustment there was still evidence for worse experience in London for 44/64 questions. In addition, adjusting for teaching hospital status made trivial difference to the case-mix-adjusted findings. There was evidence that London versus rest-of-England differences were greater for patients with cancer compared with (general) hospital inpatients for 10 of 16 questions in both the Cancer Patient Experience and the Adult Inpatients Surveys. Conclusions: Patients with cancer treated by London hospitals report worse care experiences and by and large these differences are not explained by patient case-mix or teaching hospital status. Efforts to improve care in London should aim to meet patient expectations and improve care quality.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institute for Health Research (NIHR)en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipMacmillan Cancer Supporten_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 4, article e004039en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004039
dc.identifier.grantnumberPDF-2011-04-047en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/35829
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Groupen_GB
dc.rightsThis is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work noncommercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/en_GB
dc.titleWhat explains worse patient experience in London? Evidence from secondary analysis of the Cancer Patient Experience Surveyen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2019-02-08T10:23:17Z
dc.identifier.issn2044-6055
dc.descriptionThis is the final published version. Available from BMJ Publishing Group via the DOI in this record.en_GB
dc.identifier.journalBMJ Openen_GB
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/en_GB
pubs.euro-pubmed-idMED:24390383
dcterms.dateAccepted2013-11-25
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2013-11-25
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2019-02-08T10:20:45Z
refterms.versionFCDVoR
refterms.dateFOA2019-02-08T10:23:20Z
refterms.panelAen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with
the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license,
which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work noncommercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided
the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work noncommercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/