Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorIvory, S
dc.contributor.authorRussell, J
dc.contributor.authorEarly, R
dc.contributor.authorSax, D
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-08T11:53:18Z
dc.date.issued2019-04-15
dc.description.abstractAim: Many species’ climate tolerances are broader than those estimated from current native ranges. Indeed, some Afromontane trees’ niches are up to 50% larger after incorporating fossil data. This expansion could reduce estimates of species’ future range loss due to climate change but also implies strong non-climatic limitations on species’ current ranges. One such limitation is land use, which fossil data suggest influences Afromontane tree distribution, preventing these trees from occupying warmer conditions than they currently do. We aim to assess the degree to which the broader climatic tolerances revealed by fossil data buffers projected range loss from climate and land use for Afromontane trees. Location: Africa. Time period: Last 21,000 years. Major taxa studied: Afromontane trees. Methods: We used species distribution models informed by both current and fossil distributions to project future ranges under climate and land-use projections. Results: We found that projected range reductions are only slightly ameliorated by incorporating fossil distributions and these improvements diminish further under severe land use or climate change scenarios. Taxa that are less impacted by climate are more impacted by intense land use. Depending on the severity of climate and land use, the geographic extent of Afromontane tree species’ ranges will contract by 40-85% and the trees will completely be lost from large portions of Africa. We projected that the surviving species’ ranges will become increasingly fragmented. Main conclusions: Maintaining Afromontane ecosystems will require mitigation of both climate and land-use change and protecting areas to optimize connectivity. Our findings caution that species with climate tolerances broader than their current range might not necessarily fare better under strong changes in climate or land use.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationPublished online 15 April 2019.en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/geb.12909
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/35851
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherWileyen_GB
dc.rights.embargoreasonUnder embargo until 15 April 2020 in compliance with publisher policy.
dc.rights© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
dc.subjecttropical climateen_GB
dc.subjectpaleoecologyen_GB
dc.subjectbiogeographyen_GB
dc.subjectspecies distribution modelsen_GB
dc.subjectnicheen_GB
dc.subject5 tropical forestsen_GB
dc.subjectrange collapseen_GB
dc.subjectAfromontaneen_GB
dc.titleBroader niches revealed by fossil data don’t reduce estimates of range loss and fragmentation of African montane treesen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2019-02-08T11:53:18Z
dc.identifier.issn1466-822X
dc.descriptionThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Wiley via the DOI in this record.en_GB
dc.descriptionThe data supporting the results already exists and is freely available in the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) and the African Pollen Database (APD).en_GB
dc.identifier.journalGlobal Ecology and Biogeographyen_GB
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserveden_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2019-02-05
rioxxterms.versionAMen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2019-02-05
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2019-02-07T16:06:17Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.panelAen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record