Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWhittle, J
dc.contributor.authorHailwood, M
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-13T11:23:32Z
dc.date.issued2018-12-09
dc.description.abstractThis article presents new evidence of gendered work patterns in the pre-industrial economy, providing an overview of women's work in early modern England. Evidence of 4,300 work tasks undertaken by particular women and men was collected from three types of court documents (coroners’ reports, church court depositions, and quarter sessions examinations) from five counties in south-western England (Cornwall, Devon, Hampshire, Somerset, and Wiltshire) between 1500 and 1700. The findings show that women participated in all the main areas of the economy. However, different patterns of gendered work were identified in different parts of the economy: craft work showed a sharp division of labour and agriculture a flexible division of labour, while differences of gender were less pronounced in everyday commerce. Quantitative evidence of early modern housework and care work in England indicates that such work used less time and was less family-based than is often assumed. Comparisons with gendered work patterns in early modern Germany and Sweden are drawn and show strong similarities to England. In conclusion it is argued that the gender division of labour cannot be explained by a single factor, as different influences were at play in different parts of the economy.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipLeverhulme Trusten_GB
dc.identifier.citationPublished online 09 December 2018en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/ehr.12821
dc.identifier.grantnumberRGP-2014-313en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/35929
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherWileyen_GB
dc.rights.embargoreasonUnder embargo until 09 December 2020 in compliance with publisher policy.
dc.rights© 2018 Economic History Societyen_GB
dc.titleThe gender division of labour in early modern Englanden_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2019-02-13T11:23:32Z
dc.identifier.issn0013-0117
dc.descriptionThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Wiley via the DOI in this record.en_GB
dc.identifier.journalEconomic History Reviewen_GB
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserveden_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2018-12-09
exeter.funder::Leverhulme Trusten_GB
rioxxterms.versionAMen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2018-12-09
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2019-02-13T11:13:53Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.panelDen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record