Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWaterman, K
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-25T09:19:37Z
dc.date.issued2019-02-25
dc.description.abstractRapid economic growth in emerging economies since the end of the Cold War has driven debate on American ‘relative decline’; the relative diminution of US material capabilities with respect to other states. Such relative decline poses potential constraints on US power and has thus manifested itself in arguments over the economic merits of the United States’ expansive military commitments. Contributing to this literature, my thesis answers the following question: does American military strategy generate economic benefits? I argue that that there is significant evidence to suggest that US military strategy has influenced international economic relationships in ways beneficial to US national interests. Principally, my analysis shows American military strategy acts as a ‘underwriter’ for the extant international economic system. I explore two logics associated with this. Firstly, a general ‘status quo’ logic which sees military power as both a guarantor and promoter of specific structural configurations of the international political economy. And secondly, a more specific ‘utility’ logic operating on other states either bilaterally or multilaterally. This pathway assumes that US military strategy, particularly its security guarantees, may alter the utility of other states decisions in America’s favour. This thesis also shows that specific results often prove far more tentative and circumstantial than commonly articulated by scholars in the literature. Nearly all specific and ‘utility’ pathways through which the United States is hypothesized to derive economic benefit suffer from foundational generalisability issues, irrespective of methodology. This suggests that specific avenues and instances of US military strategy influencing international economic relationships are not likely to be a reliable or prudent source of future policy making. Rather, the principal political-economic influence to consider is the role US military power plays in underwriting the contemporary American centred international order, which is the prerequisite for other specific pathways to emerge.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipEconomic and Social Research Council (ESRC)en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/36040
dc.publisherUniversity of Exeteren_GB
dc.subjectMilitary Strategyen_GB
dc.subjectInternational Political Economyen_GB
dc.titleThe Political Economy of U.S. Military Strategyen_GB
dc.typeThesis or dissertationen_GB
dc.date.available2019-02-25T09:19:37Z
dc.contributor.advisorStokes, Den_GB
dc.contributor.advisorBaele, Sen_GB
dc.publisher.departmentPolitics and International Relationsen_GB
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserveden_GB
dc.type.degreetitlePhD in Politicsen_GB
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen_GB
dc.type.qualificationnameDoctoral Thesisen_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2019-02-25
exeter.funder::Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC)en_GB
rioxxterms.versionNAen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2019-01-07
rioxxterms.typeThesisen_GB
refterms.dateFOA2019-02-25T09:19:40Z


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record