Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDuffy, E
dc.contributor.authorArcher, CR
dc.contributor.authorSharma, MD
dc.contributor.authorPrus, M
dc.contributor.authorJoag, RA
dc.contributor.authorRadwan, J
dc.contributor.authorWedell, N
dc.contributor.authorHosken, DJ
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-28T13:21:48Z
dc.date.issued2018-12-26
dc.description.abstractMales and females share most of their genome and develop many of the same traits. However, each sex frequently has different optimal values for these shared traits, creating intralocus sexual conflict. This conflict has been observed in wild and laboratory populations of insects and affects important evolutionary processes such as sexual selection, the maintenance of genetic variation, and possibly even speciation. Given the broad impacts of intralocus conflict, accurately detecting and measuring it is important. A common way to detect intralocus sexual conflict is to calculate the intersexual genetic correlation for fitness, with negative values suggesting conflict. Here, we highlight a potential confounder of this measure—cytoplasmic incompatibility caused by the intracellular parasite Wolbachia. Infection with Wolbachia can generate negative intersexual genetic correlations for fitness in insects, suggestive of intralocus sexual conflict. This is because cytoplasmic incompatibility reduces the fitness of uninfected females mated to infected males, while uninfected males will not suffer reductions in fitness if they mate with infected females and may even be fitter than infected males. This can lead to strong negative intersexual genetic correlations for fitness, mimicking intralocus conflict. We illustrate this issue using simulations and then present Drosophila simulans data that show how reproductive incompatibilities caused by Wolbachia infection can generate signals of intralocus sexual conflict. Given that Wolbachia infection in insect populations is pervasive, but populations usually contain both infected and uninfected individuals providing scope for cytoplasmic incompatibility, this is an important consideration for sexual conflict research but one which, to date, has been largely underappreciated.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipRoyal Societyen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipLeverhulme Trusten_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipNatural Environment Research Councilen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipNarodowe Centrum Naukien_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 9 (1), pp. 328 - 338en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/ece3.4744
dc.identifier.grantnumberRF‐2015‐001en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumberNE/G005303/1en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumberUMO‐2013/09 / N / NZ8 / 03231en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/36125
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherWileyen_GB
dc.rights© 2018 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.en_GB
dc.subjectDrosophila simulansen_GB
dc.subjectintralocus sexual conflicten_GB
dc.subjectsexual antagonismen_GB
dc.subjectwolbachiaen_GB
dc.titleWolbachia infection can bias estimates of intralocus sexual conflicten_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2019-02-28T13:21:48Z
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available from Wiley via the DOI in this record.en_GB
dc.identifier.eissn2045-7758
dc.identifier.journalEcology and Evolutionen_GB
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2018-11-01
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2018-11-01
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2019-02-28T13:18:02Z
refterms.versionFCDVoR
refterms.dateFOA2019-02-28T13:21:53Z
refterms.panelAen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2018 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2018 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.