Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRichards, SH
dc.contributor.authorCampbell, JL
dc.contributor.authorDickens, C
dc.contributor.authorAnderson, R
dc.contributor.authorGandhi, M
dc.contributor.authorGibson, A
dc.contributor.authorKessler, D
dc.contributor.authorKnight, L
dc.contributor.authorKuyken, W
dc.contributor.authorRichards, DA
dc.contributor.authorTaylor, RS
dc.contributor.authorTurner, K
dc.contributor.authorUkoumunne, OC
dc.contributor.authorDavey, A
dc.contributor.authorWarren, FC
dc.contributor.authorWinder, RE
dc.contributor.authorWright, CA
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-04T14:18:08Z
dc.date.issued2018-05-01
dc.description.abstractBackground: Around 19% of people screened by UK cardiac rehabilitation programmes report having moderate or severe symptoms of depression. These individuals are at an increased risk of cardiac mortality and morbidity, reduced quality of life and increased use of health resources compared with their non-depressed counterparts. Maximising psychological health is a goal of cardiac rehabilitation, but psychological care is patchy. Objective(s): To examine the feasibility and acceptability of embedding enhanced psychological care (EPC) within cardiac rehabilitation, we tested the feasibility of developing/implementing EPC and documented the key uncertainties associated with undertaking a definitive evaluation. Design: A two-stage multimethods study; a feasibility study and a qualitative evaluation, followed by an external pilot cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT) with a nested qualitative study. Setting: UK comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation teams. Participants: Adults eligible for cardiac rehabilitation following an acute coronary syndrome with new-onset depressive symptoms on initial nurse assessment. Patients who had received treatment for depression in the preceding 6 months were excluded. Interventions: The EPC intervention comprised nurse-led mental health-care co-ordination and behavioural activation within cardiac rehabilitation. The comparator was usual cardiac rehabilitation care. Main outcome measures: Measures at baseline, and at the 5-(feasibility and pilot) and 8-month follow-ups (pilot only). Process measures related to cardiac team and patient recruitment, and participantretention. Outcomes included depressive symptoms, cardiac mortality and morbidity, anxiety, health-related quality of life and service resource use. Interviews explored participant and nurses’ views and experiences. Results: Between September 2014 and May 2015, five nurses from four teams recruited participants into the feasibility study. Of the 203 patients screened, 30 were eligible and nine took part (the target was 20 participants). At interview, participants and nurses gave valuable insights into the EPC intervention design and delivery. Although acceptable, the EPC delivery was challenging for nurses (e.g. the ability to allocate sufficient time within existing workloads) and the intervention was modified accordingly. Between December 2014 and February 2015, 8 out of 20 teams approached agreed to participate in the pilot RCT [five were randomised to the EPC arm and three were randomised to the usual-care (UC) arm]. Of the 614 patients screened, 55 were eligible and 29 took part (the target was 43 participants). At baseline, the trial arms were well matched for sex and ethnicity, although the EPC arm participants were younger, from more deprived areas and had higher depression scores than the UC participants. A total of 27 out of 29 participants were followed up at 5 months. Interviews with 18 participants (12 in the EPC arm and six in the UC arm) and seven nurses who delivered EPC identified that both groups acknowledged the importance of receiving psychological support embedded within routine cardiac rehabilitation. For those experiencing/delivering EPC, the intervention was broadly acceptable, albeit challenging to deliver within existing care. Limitations: Both the feasibility and the pilot studies encountered significant challenges in recruiting patients, which limited the power of the pilot study analyses. Conclusions: Cardiac rehabilitation nurses can be trained to deliver EPC. Although valued by both patients and nurses, organisational and workload constraints were significant barriers to implementation in participating teams, suggesting that future research may require a modified approach to intervention delivery within current service arrangements. We obtained important data informing definitive research regarding participant recruitment and retention, and optimal methods of data collection.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institute for Health Research (NIHR)en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 22 (30)en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.3310/hta22300
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/36243
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherNIHR Journals Libraryen_GB
dc.rights© Queen’s Printer and Controller of HMSO 2018. This work was produced by Richards et al. under the terms of a commissioning contract issued by the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care. This issue may be freely reproduced for the purposes of private research and study and extracts (or indeed, the full report) may be included in professional journals provided that suitable acknowledgement is made and the reproduction is not associated with any form of advertising. Applications for commercial reproduction should be addressed to: NIHR Journals Library, National Institute for Health Research, Evaluation, Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre, Alpha House, University of Southampton Science Park, Southampton SO16 7NS, UK.en_GB
dc.titleEnhanced psychological care in cardiac rehabilitation services for patients with new-onset depression: The CADENCE feasibility study and pilot RCTen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2019-03-04T14:18:08Z
dc.identifier.issn1366-5278
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available from the publisher via the DOI in this record.en_GB
dc.descriptionThe authors confirm that all data underlying the findings are fully available without restriction. The authors have made the clinical and economic data sets available through the University of Exeter Institutional Repository – Open Research Exeter (see https://ore.exeter.ac.uk). Access to these data is permitted by controlled requests made via the repository to the chief investigator (Professor John L Campbell: john.campbell@exeter.ac.uk). Although use will be permitted, this will be on the basis that the source of the data is acknowledged (including the funder) and it includes a reference to the data set name (CADENCE) and supporting academic reference.en_GB
dc.identifier.journalHealth Technology Assessmenten_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2017-09-22
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2018-05-01
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2019-03-04T13:58:54Z
refterms.versionFCDVoR
refterms.dateFOA2019-03-04T14:18:12Z
refterms.panelAen_GB
refterms.depositExceptionpublishedGoldOA
refterms.depositExceptionExplanationhttps://doi.org/10.3310/hta22300


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record