Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBarneche, DR
dc.contributor.authorRezende, EL
dc.contributor.authorParravicini, V
dc.contributor.authorMaire, E
dc.contributor.authorEdgar, GJ
dc.contributor.authorStuart-Smith, JE
dc.contributor.authorFerreira, CEL
dc.contributor.authorFriedlander, AM
dc.contributor.authorGreen, AL
dc.contributor.authorLuiz, OJ
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez-Zaragoza, FA
dc.contributor.authorVigliola, L
dc.contributor.authorKulbicki, M
dc.contributor.authorFloeter, SR
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-05T09:15:54Z
dc.date.issued2018-12-17
dc.description.abstractAim To investigate biotic and abiotic correlates of reef‐fish species richness across multiple spatial scales. Location Tropical reefs around the globe, including 485 sites in 109 sub‐provinces spread across 14 biogeographic provinces. Time period Present. Major taxa studied 2,523 species of reef fish. Methods We compiled a database encompassing 13,050 visual transects. We used hierarchical linear Bayesian models to investigate whether fish body size, reef area, isolation, temperature, and anthropogenic impacts correlate with reef‐fish species richness at each spatial scale (i.e., sites, sub‐provinces, provinces). Richness was estimated using coverage‐based rarefaction. We also tested whether species packing (i.e., transect‐level species richness/m2) is correlated with province‐level richness. Results Body size had the strongest effect on species richness across all three spatial scales. Reef area and temperature were both positively correlated with richness at all spatial scales. At the site scale only, richness decreased with reef isolation. Species richness was not correlated with proxies of human impacts. Species packing was correlated with species richness at the province level following a sub‐linear power function. Province‐level differences in species richness were also mirrored by patterns of body size distribution at the site scale. Species‐rich provinces exhibited heterogeneous assemblages of small‐bodied species with small range sizes, whereas species‐poor provinces encompassed homogeneous assemblages composed by larger species with greater dispersal capacity. Main conclusions Our findings suggest that body size distribution, reef area and temperature are major predictors of species richness and accumulation across scales, consistent with recent theories linking home range to species–area relationships as well as metabolic effects on speciation rates. Based on our results, we hypothesize that in less diverse areas, species are larger and likely more dispersive, leading to larger range sizes and less turnover between sites. Our results indicate that changes in province‐level (i.e., regional) richness should leave a tractable fingerprint in local assemblages, and that detailed studies on local‐scale assemblage composition may be informative of responses occurring at larger scales.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipFrench Foundation for Research on Biodiversity (FRB)en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipCenter of Synthesis and Analysis of Biodiversity (CESAB)en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipBolsa Jovem Talentoen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipSISBIOTA‐Maren_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipPro-Africaen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipCAPES, Marinha do Brasil, Instituto Laje Vivaen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipInstitut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipPRISTINE Projecten_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipCICESEen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipUniversidad de Guadalajaraen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipUABCSen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipUMARen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipUNACARen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipCONABIOen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipPROMEPen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipSEP‐CONACYTen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipWWF-CAen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipFundación Cayo Cochinosen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipUSAIDen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipFFEMen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipINPESCAen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Geographic Societyen_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 28 (3), pp. 315 - 327en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/geb.12851
dc.identifier.grantnumberCNPq 402053/2012-5en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumberCNPq 563276/2010-0en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumberFAPESC 6308/2011-8en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumberCNPq 490531/2007-5en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumberHJ026en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumber103.5/08/2919en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumber103.5/10/927en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/36267
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherWileyen_GB
dc.rights.embargoreasonPublisher policy.
dc.rights© 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltden_GB
dc.subjectbiogeographyen_GB
dc.subjectcommunity assemblyen_GB
dc.subjectlocal diversityen_GB
dc.subjectneutral theoryen_GB
dc.subjectregional diversityen_GB
dc.subjectspatial scaleen_GB
dc.subjectspecies energyen_GB
dc.titleBody size, reef area and temperature predict global reef-fish species richness across spatial scalesen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2019-03-05T09:15:54Z
dc.contributor.editorSorte, Cen_GB
dc.identifier.issn1466-822X
exeter.article-number3en_GB
dc.descriptionThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Wiley via the DOI in this record.en_GB
dc.descriptionAll data and R code (data manipulation, analyses, figures and tables) can be downloaded from a GitHub repository (https://github.com/dbarneche/speciesPacking), which will be made publicly available upon publication.en_GB
dc.identifier.journalGlobal Ecology and Biogeographyen_GB
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserveden_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2018-09-25
rioxxterms.versionAMen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2018-09-25
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2019-03-05T09:05:20Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.panelAen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record