Three cardinal numbers to safeguard bees against pesticide exposure: LD50, NOEC (revised) and the Haber exponent
dc.contributor.author | Cresswell, JE | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-03-05T12:30:31Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018-07-23 | |
dc.description.abstract | Regulators often employ cardinal indicators to justify measures to protect the health of farmland bees from pesticides used in crop protection. Previously, in evaluating the likely hazard of a compound, they have made extensive use of its LD50 (‘lethal dose to 50% of exposed subjects’), and NOEC (‘no observable effect concentration’). Here, I argue that regulators should also use a third indicator, namely the Haber exponent. The Haber exponent qualifies the meaning of the LD50 by revealing the relative hazard of environmentally relevant exposures longer than that used to determine the LD50 originally. Additionally, I show how the experimental protocol used to determine the Haber exponent will also produce a well-founded, parametric value of the NOEC. Taken together, these three numbers establish a strong foundation on which to evaluate the potential impact of an agrochemical on bees. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.citation | Nr. 462 (2018): Hazards of pesticides to bees 13th International Symposium of the ICP-PR Bee Protection Group 18. - 20. October 2017, València (Spain) - Proceedings - Vol. 462, pp. 18 - 24 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.5073/jka.2018.462.003 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10871/36283 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | Julius Kühn-Institut - Bundesforschungsinstitut für Kulturpflanzen (Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants) | en_GB |
dc.rights | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | en_GB |
dc.title | Three cardinal numbers to safeguard bees against pesticide exposure: LD50, NOEC (revised) and the Haber exponent | en_GB |
dc.type | Conference proceedings | en_GB |
dc.date.available | 2019-03-05T12:30:31Z | |
dc.identifier.isbn | 978-3-95547-064-7 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1868-9892 | |
dc.description | This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from the publisher via the DOI in this record | en_GB |
dc.identifier.journal | Julius-Kühn-Archiv | en_GB |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | en_GB |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2018-07-23 | |
rioxxterms.version | AM | en_GB |
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate | 2018 | |
rioxxterms.type | Conference Paper/Proceeding/Abstract | en_GB |
refterms.dateFCD | 2019-03-05T12:25:49Z | |
refterms.versionFCD | AM | |
refterms.dateFOA | 2019-03-05T12:30:34Z | |
refterms.panel | A | en_GB |
refterms.depositException | publishedGoldOA | |
refterms.depositExceptionExplanation | https://doi.org/10.5073/jka.2018.462.003 |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/