dc.contributor.author | Jepson, R | |
dc.contributor.author | Hunter, R | |
dc.contributor.author | Williams, AJ | |
dc.contributor.author | Milton, K | |
dc.contributor.author | Foster, C | |
dc.contributor.author | Kelly, M | |
dc.contributor.author | Baker, G | |
dc.contributor.author | Turner, K | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-03-28T14:12:45Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018-10-01 | |
dc.description.abstract | Transport has the potential to promote health, through enabling greater
access and encouraging physical activity, and also to impact on health
negatively, through causing road traffic collisions and influencing exposure to noise and air pollution.
A range of methods and approaches are used in the evaluation.
1. Natural experimental, and before and after designs are used to
evaluate effectiveness on a range of outcomes including: casualties;
cycling and walking; driver perceptions and behaviours; and liveability. Quantitative data for evaluating effectiveness are drawn from
a range of sources including Local Authorities, Sustrans (a sustainable
transport charity), Routine Police Data and researcher collected data.
2. Qualitative methods (interviews and focus groups) are employed to:
test and refine the programme theory; explore implementation; and
learn more about transferability to different settings. Documentary
analyses and social media analyses are also used to add to our
understanding of key drivers and factor involved in decisions to
implement speed limits in other parts of the UK, and whether they
were successful or not.
3. Modelling and economic methods are used to test cost-effectiveness.
We will present an overview of the methods used and some of the
challenges of undertaking such a complex evaluation of a communitywide public health intervention. | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) | en_GB |
dc.identifier.citation | Vol. 15 (10), supplement 1, p. S227 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1123/jpah.2018-0535 | |
dc.identifier.grantnumber | 15/82/12 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10871/36662 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | Human Kinetics | en_GB |
dc.rights | © 2018 Human Kinetics | en_GB |
dc.title | Is 20 Plenty For Health? Methods for an evaluation of the 20 mph/30kph speed limit in Edinburgh and Belfast on a range of public health outcomes | en_GB |
dc.type | Conference paper | en_GB |
dc.date.available | 2019-03-28T14:12:45Z | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1543-3080 | |
dc.description | This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Human Kinetics via the DOI in this record | en_GB |
dc.description | Poster abstract presented at the 7th International Society for Physical Activity and Health Congress, 15–17 October 2018,
London, England | en_GB |
dc.identifier.journal | Journal of Physical Activity and Health | en_GB |
dc.rights.uri | http://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved | en_GB |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2018 | |
exeter.funder | ::National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) | en_GB |
rioxxterms.version | AM | en_GB |
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate | 2018-10-01 | |
rioxxterms.type | Conference Paper/Proceeding/Abstract | en_GB |
refterms.dateFCD | 2019-03-28T14:10:01Z | |
refterms.versionFCD | AM | |
refterms.dateFOA | 2019-03-28T14:12:47Z | |
refterms.panel | A | en_GB |