Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorYeo, NL
dc.contributor.authorElliott, LR
dc.contributor.authorBethel, A
dc.contributor.authorWhite, MP
dc.contributor.authorDean, SG
dc.contributor.authorGarside, R
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-01T08:44:41Z
dc.date.issued2019-03-18
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Having contact with nature can be beneficial for health and wellbeing, but many older adults face barriers with getting outdoors. We conducted a systematic review of quantitative studies on health and wellbeing impacts of indoor forms of nature (both real and simulated/artificial), for older adults in residential settings. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Search terms relating to older adults and indoor nature were run in 13 scientific databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, AgeLine, Environment Complete, AMED, PsychINFO, EMBASE, HMIC, PsychARTICLES, Global Health, Web of Knowledge, Dissertations and Theses Global, and ASSIA). We also pursued grey literature, global clinical trials registries, and a range of supplementary methods. RESULTS: Of 6,131 articles screened against eligibility criteria, 26 studies were accepted into the review, and were quality-appraised using the Effective Public Health Practice Project (EPHPP) tool. The participants were 930 adults aged over 60. Nature interventions and health/wellbeing outcomes were heterogeneous, which necessitated a narrative synthesis. The evidence base was generally weak, with 18 of 26 studies having a high risk of bias. However, several higher-quality studies found indoor gardening and horticulture programs were effective for cognition, psychological wellbeing, social outcomes, and life satisfaction. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: There is inconsistent evidence that indoor nature exposures are beneficial for older care residents. We expect that successful interventions were, at least partly, facilitating social interaction, supporting feelings of autonomy/control, and promoting skill development, that is, factors not necessarily associated with nature per se. Higher-quality studies with improved reporting standards are needed to further elucidate these mechanisms.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipEuropean Commissionen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institute for Health Research (NIHR)en_GB
dc.identifier.citationPublished online 18 March 2019en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/geront/gnz019
dc.identifier.grantnumber666773en_GB
dc.identifier.other5382625
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/36685
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherOxford University Press (OUP)en_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30884495en_GB
dc.rights.embargoreasonUnder embargo until 18 March 2020 in compliance with publisher policy.
dc.rights© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.en_GB
dc.subjectIndoor environmenten_GB
dc.subjectIntervention studiesen_GB
dc.subjectNatureen_GB
dc.subjectResidential careen_GB
dc.subjectWellbeingen_GB
dc.titleIndoor Nature Interventions for Health and Wellbeing of Older Adults in Residential Settings: A Systematic Review.en_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2019-04-01T08:44:41Z
dc.identifier.issn0016-9013
exeter.place-of-publicationUnited Statesen_GB
dc.descriptionThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Oxford University Press via the DOI in this record.en_GB
dc.identifier.journalGerontologisten_GB
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserveden_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2019-01-15
exeter.funder::European Commissionen_GB
rioxxterms.versionAMen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2019-03-16
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2019-04-01T08:41:17Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.panelAen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record