Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLord, P
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-02T08:32:25Z
dc.date.issued2019-04-01
dc.description.abstractLabour law is under threat. With crises pervading its normative paradigm, coverage and enforcement, its ability to regulate modern working relationships has recently been questioned. Fundamental to each layer of crisis, whether philosophical, empirical or judicial, is the predominant narrative of conflict as an axiomatic feature of what it means to be employed. This research questions the simplicity of that view and argues that the answer to the discipline’s crisis of identity does not lie in reimagining the crisis but in the reimagination of labour law’s identity. Applying a sociological lens and by focusing on one industry - agriculture - a more contextual picture emerged. Through conducting interviews with 31 farmers and farmworkers in England and Wales regarding their management of the statutory employment rights of status, wages, hours, leave, and health and safety, new insights appeared, to challenge the conflict narrative. In sum, these farmers managed labour rights based on principles of informality, flexibility, professionalisation and “good employership” and not, necessarily, the law. Consequently, legal compliance varied between formal, accidental, presumed and noncompliance, creating a disparity between legal expectation and practice. The reasons for this divergence stemmed from the interplay between agency and structure, and the constraints of the agricultural industry which confined labour decisions. Managing labour rights through these principles, to respond to these constraints, and not via the standard model which law promotes, led to a two-fold impact. First, unintended consequences arose where standardisation failed to reflect the internal realities. Second, workers were not exploited in the absence of law. Instead, relationships were generally reciprocal, mutually contingent and valued. For the law, this queries the authenticity of our paradigm and associated normative models. Instead, a new narrative is needed, built on the preservation of harmonious work relationships, to move labour law out of crisis and beyond conflict.en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/36701
dc.publisherUniversity of Exeteren_GB
dc.rights.embargoreasonIntention to publish from thesisen_GB
dc.subjectlabour lawen_GB
dc.subjectfarming industryen_GB
dc.subjectsocio-legal studiesen_GB
dc.titleBeyond Conflict: Lessons from the Fieldsen_GB
dc.typeThesis or dissertationen_GB
dc.contributor.advisorNjoya, Wen_GB
dc.contributor.advisorTrinder, Een_GB
dc.contributor.advisorLobley, Men_GB
dc.contributor.advisorTrinder, Len_GB
dc.publisher.departmentLawen_GB
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserveden_GB
dc.type.degreetitlePhD in Lawen_GB
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen_GB
dc.type.qualificationnameDoctoral Thesisen_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2019-04-02
rioxxterms.versionNAen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2019-03-01
rioxxterms.typeThesisen_GB
refterms.dateFOA2024-04-01T00:00:00Z


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record