Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGwernan-Jones, RC
dc.contributor.authorBritten, N
dc.contributor.authorAllard, J
dc.contributor.authorBaker, E
dc.contributor.authorGill, L
dc.contributor.authorLloyd, H
dc.contributor.authorRawcliffe, T
dc.contributor.authorSayers, R
dc.contributor.authorPlappert, H
dc.contributor.authorGibson, J
dc.contributor.authorClark, M
dc.contributor.authorBirchwood, M
dc.contributor.authorPinfold, V
dc.contributor.authorReilly, S
dc.contributor.authorGask, L
dc.contributor.authorByng, R
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-18T13:33:31Z
dc.date.issued2019-05-26
dc.description.abstractIn this paper we present an exemplar of the initial theory-building phase of Theory-driven Evaluation (TDE) for the PARTNERS2 project, a collaborative care intervention for people with experience of psychosis in England. Initial theory-building involved analysis of literature, interviews with key leaders, and focus groups with service users. The initial programme theory (IPT) was developed from these sources in an iterative process between researchers and stakeholders (service users, practitioners, commissioners) involving four activities: articulation of 442 explanatory statements systematically developed using realist methods; debate and consensus; communication; interrogation. We refute two criticisms of TDE of complex interventions. We demonstrate how the process of initial theory-building made a meaningful contribution to our complex intervention in five ways. Although time consuming, it allowed us to develop an internally coherent and well documented intervention. This study and the lessons learnt provide a detailed resource for other researchers wishing to build theory for TDE.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institute for Health Research (NIHR)en_GB
dc.identifier.citationPublished online 26 May 2019.
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/1356389019850199
dc.identifier.grantnumberRP-PG-0611-20004en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/36872
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherSAGE Publicationsen_GB
dc.rights© The Author(s) 2019.
dc.subjectProgramme theory developmenten_GB
dc.subjecttheory-driven evaluationen_GB
dc.subjectcomplex interventionsen_GB
dc.subjectcollaborative careen_GB
dc.subjectpersonal recoveryen_GB
dc.subjectpsychosisen_GB
dc.titleA worked example of initial theory-building: PARTNERS2 collaborative care for people who have experienced psychosis in Englanden_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2019-04-18T13:33:31Z
dc.descriptionThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from SAGE Publications via the DOI in this record.en_GB
dc.identifier.eissn1461-7153
dc.identifier.journalEvaluationen_GB
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserveden_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2019-04-17
rioxxterms.versionAMen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2019-04-17
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2019-04-18T10:12:55Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.dateFOA2019-05-28T14:10:49Z
refterms.panelAen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record