Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSutter, A
dc.contributor.authorTravers, LM
dc.contributor.authorWeedon, M
dc.contributor.authorOku, K
dc.contributor.authorPrice, TAR
dc.contributor.authorWedell, N
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-29T12:58:07Z
dc.date.issued2019-04-10
dc.description.abstractWhat drives mating system variation is a major question in evolutionary biology. Female multiple mating (polyandry) has diverse evolutionary consequences, and there are many potential benefits and costs of polyandry. However, our understanding of its evolution is biased towards studies enforcing monandry in polyandrous species. What drives and maintains variation in polyandry between individuals, genotypes, populations and species remains poorly understood. Genetic variation in polyandry may be actively maintained by selection, or arise by chance if polyandry is selectively neutral. In Drosophila pseudoobscura, there is genetic variation in polyandry between and within populations. We used isofemale lines to found replicate populations with high or low initial levels of polyandry, and tracked polyandry under experimental evolution over seven generations. Polyandry remained relatively stable, reflecting the starting frequencies of the experimental populations. There were no clear fitness differences between high versus low polyandry genotypes, and there was no signature of balancing selection. We confirmed these patterns in direct comparisons between evolved and ancestral females, and found no consequences of polyandry for female fecundity. The absence of differential selection even when initiating populations with major differences in polyandry casts some doubt on the importance of polyandry for female fitness. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipNatural Environment Research Council (NERC)en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipH2020 Marie Skłodowska‐Curie Actionsen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschungen_GB
dc.identifier.citationPublished online 10 April 2019en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jeb.13476
dc.identifier.grantnumberNE/I027711/1en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumber746169en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumberP2ZHP3_164990, P300PA_177906en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/36928
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherWileyen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30970158en_GB
dc.rights.embargoreasonUnder embargo until 10 April 2020 in compliance with publisher policy.en_GB
dc.rights© 2019 European Society For Evolutionary Biology. Journal of Evolutionary Biology © 2019 European Society For Evolutionary Biologyen_GB
dc.subjectDrosophila pseudoobscuraen_GB
dc.subjectbalancing selectionen_GB
dc.subjectdirectional selectionen_GB
dc.subjectgenetic variationen_GB
dc.subjectisofemale linesen_GB
dc.subjectmonandryen_GB
dc.subjectmultiple matingen_GB
dc.titleNo selection for change in polyandry under experimental evolution.en_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2019-04-29T12:58:07Z
dc.identifier.issn1010-061X
exeter.place-of-publicationSwitzerlanden_GB
dc.descriptionThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Wiley via the DOI in this record.  en_GB
dc.identifier.journalJournal of Evolutionary Biologyen_GB
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserveden_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2019-04-05
exeter.funder::Natural Environment Research Council (NERC)en_GB
rioxxterms.versionAMen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2019-04-05
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2019-04-29T12:48:03Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.dateFOA2020-04-09T23:00:00Z
refterms.panelAen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record