Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorVieira, WF
dc.contributor.authorKerry, C
dc.contributor.authorHockings, KJ
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-15T10:24:52Z
dc.date.issued2019-04-13
dc.description.abstractHuman activities impact the distribution of numerous species. Anthropogenic habitats are often fragmented, and wildlife must navigate through human-influenced and ‘natural’ parts of the landscape to access resources. Different methods to determine the home-range areas of nonhuman primates have not considered the additional complexities of ranging in anthropogenic areas. Here, using 6 months of spatial data on the distribution of chimpanzee presence (feces, feeding traces, nests, opportunistic encounters; n = 833) collected across the wet and dry seasons, we examine different analytical techniques to calculate the home-range size of an unhabituated chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes verus) community inhabiting a forest–farm mosaic at Madina, Cantanhez National Park in Guinea-Bissau. The minimum convex polygon method and the grid cell (500 m × 500 m cell size) method estimated the chimpanzees home-range size at 19.02 and 15.50 km 2 , respectively with kernel analysis calculating a lower value of 8.52 km 2 . For the grid cell method, home-range estimates varied with cell size, with larger cells producing larger estimates. We compare our home-range estimates with other chimpanzee research sites across Africa. We recommend the use of kernel analysis for determining primate home ranges, especially for those groups exploiting fragmented habitats including forest–farm mosaics, as this method takes account of inaccessible or infrequently used anthropogenic areas across the complete home range of the primate group. However, care must be taken when using this method, since it is sensitive to small sample sizes that can occur when studying unhabituated communities, resulting in underestimated home ranges.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipFundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT)en_GB
dc.identifier.citationPublished online 13 April 2019en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10329-019-00724-1
dc.identifier.grantnumberIF/01128/2014en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/37099
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherSpringer Verlagen_GB
dc.rights© The Author(s) 2019. Open Access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.en_GB
dc.subjectPrimate home-range analysisen_GB
dc.subjectChimpanzeesen_GB
dc.subjectAnthropogenic habitatsen_GB
dc.subjectHabitat fragmentationen_GB
dc.subjectHuman–wildlife interactionsen_GB
dc.titleA comparison of methods to determine chimpanzee home-range size in a forest–farm mosaic at Madina in Cantanhez National Park, Guinea-Bissauen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2019-05-15T10:24:52Z
dc.identifier.issn0032-8332
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available on open access from Springer Verlag via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.identifier.journalPrimatesen_GB
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2019-04-01
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2019-04-01
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2019-05-15T10:23:20Z
refterms.versionFCDVoR
refterms.dateFOA2019-05-15T10:24:55Z
refterms.panelAen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© The Author(s) 2019.
Open Access.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © The Author(s) 2019. Open Access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.