Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBarry, J
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-12T11:55:58Z
dc.date.issued2019-08-08
dc.description.abstractThe tension between theoretical and practical knowledge was particularly problematic for trainee physicians. Unlike civic apprenticeships in surgery and pharmacy, in early modern England there was no standard procedure for obtaining education in the practical aspects of the physician’s role, a very uncertain process of certification, and little regulation to ensure a suitable reward for their educational investment. For all the emphasis on academic learning and international travel, the majority of provincial physicians returned to practice in their home area, because establishing a practice owed more to networks of kinship, patronage and credit than to formal qualifications. Only when (and where) practitioners had to rely solely on their professional qualification to establish their status as young practitioners that the community could trust would proposals to reform medical education, such as those put forward to address a crisis of medicine in Restoration London, which are examined here, be converted into national regulation of medical education in the early nineteenth century, although these proposals prefigured many informal developments in medical training in the eighteenth century.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipWellcome Trusten_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 32 (2), pp. 137-154
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/S0269889719000188
dc.identifier.grantnumber097782/Z/11/Zen_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/37489
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherCambridge University Press (CUP)en_GB
dc.rights© Cambridge University Press 2019. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
dc.titleEducating physicians in seventeenth-century Englanden_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2019-06-12T11:55:58Z
dc.identifier.issn0269-8897
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available on open access from Cambridge University Press via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.identifier.journalScience in Contexten_GB
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2019-05-01
exeter.funder::Wellcome Trusten_GB
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2019-06-30
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2019-06-11T15:19:38Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.dateFOA2019-06-12T11:56:02Z
refterms.panelDen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© Cambridge University Press 2019.
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © Cambridge University Press 2019. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.