Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorVaughan, NE
dc.contributor.authorGough, C
dc.contributor.authorMander, S
dc.contributor.authorLittleton, EW
dc.contributor.authorWelfle, A
dc.contributor.authorGernaat, DEHJ
dc.contributor.authorVan Vuuren, DP
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-21T12:49:00Z
dc.date.issued2018-04-01
dc.description.abstractPublished by IOP Publishing Ltd. Biomass Energy with Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS) is heavily relied upon in scenarios of future emissions that are consistent with limiting global mean temperature increase to 1.5 °C or 2 °C above pre-industrial. These temperature limits are defined in the Paris Agreement in order to reduce the risks and impacts of climate change. Here, we explore the use of BECCS technologies in a reference scenario and three low emission scenarios generated by an integrated assessment model (IMAGE). Using these scenarios we investigate the feasibility of key implicit and explicit assumptions about these BECCS technologies, including biomass resource, land use, CO 2 storage capacity and carbon capture and storage (CCS) deployment rate. In these scenarios, we find that half of all global CO 2 storage required by 2100 occurs in USA, Western Europe, China and India, which is compatible with current estimates of regional CO 2 storage capacity. CCS deployment rates in the scenarios are very challenging compared to historical rates of fossil, renewable or nuclear technologies and are entirely dependent on stringent policy action to incentivise CCS. In the scenarios, half of the biomass resource is derived from agricultural and forestry residues and half from dedicated bioenergy crops grown on abandoned agricultural land and expansion into grasslands (i.e. land for forests and food production is protected). Poor governance of the sustainability of bioenergy crop production can significantly limit the amount of CO 2 removed by BECCS, through soil carbon loss from direct and indirect land use change. Only one-third of the bioenergy crops are grown in regions associated with more developed governance frameworks. Overall, the scenarios in IMAGE are ambitious but consistent with current relevant literature with respect to assumed biomass resource, land use and CO 2 storage capacity.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 13en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1088/1748-9326/aaaa02
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/37616
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherIOP Publishingen_GB
dc.rights© The Author(s). Open Access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC-BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/). This allows the articles to be shared, adapted and made commercial use of, subject to appropriate attribution. Please check the licence for full licence terms and attribution requirements.en_GB
dc.subject1.5◦Cen_GB
dc.subjectbiomass energy with carbon capture and storageen_GB
dc.subjectintegrated assessment modelen_GB
dc.subjectnegative emissions technologiesen_GB
dc.subjectcarbondioxide removalen_GB
dc.subject2◦Cen_GB
dc.subjectclimate change mitigationen_GB
dc.titleEvaluating the use of biomass energy with carbon capture and storage in low emission scenariosen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2019-06-21T12:49:00Z
dc.identifier.issn1748-9318
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available from IOP Publishing via the DOI in this record.en_GB
dc.identifier.journalEnvironmental research lettersen_GB
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserveden_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2018-01-23
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2018-04-01
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2019-06-21T12:39:49Z
refterms.versionFCDVoR
refterms.dateFOA2019-06-21T12:49:03Z
refterms.panelCen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record