Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTebboth, MGL
dc.contributor.authorConway, D
dc.contributor.authorAdger, WN
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-24T15:25:10Z
dc.date.issued2019-01-25
dc.description.abstractIn economically marginal rural areas, choice in livelihood strategy such as decisions to move location mediates levels of individual and household resilience under conditions of environmental change. It is widely recognised that endowments associated with mobility and the entitlement to mobility are unevenly distributed across populations. This paper integrates these insights and conceptualises location choice as a set of mobility endowments and mobility entitlements. Through focussing on endowments and entitlements, the paper explores how choice affects the ability to be mobile and its role in mediating levels of resilience to livelihood shocks associated with changing environmental conditions. The research design involves measuring the impact of different climatic perturbations in rural locations in Anhui Province, China. Mixed methods of rural appraisal, life history interviews, and a household survey generate objective and perceived elements of individual and household responses to risks. These data are augmented by biophysical observations on the nature of the climatic perturbations. The results show that mobility endowments and mobility entitlements are important in determining the impact of mobility on resilience. The life history interview data highlight significant individual agency within the structures that impact on individual choices. Further, individuals and households who possess the ability to decide and to subsequently enact decisions about mobility, are shown to be more resilient compared to other individuals and households that lack such ability. Moreover, households practicing short-term, circular mobility are more resilient than those households that practice long-term mobility. The study confirms that, in these instances, choice and the ability to enact those choices mediates resilience and highlights the implications of location decisions but also the conditions in which those decisions are made.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipNatural Environment Research Council (NERC)en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 54, pp. 172 - 183en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.12.002
dc.identifier.grantnumber109181en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/37650
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherElsevieren_GB
dc.rights.embargoreasonUnder embargo until 25 January 2020 in compliance with publisher policy.en_GB
dc.rights© 2018. This version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ en_GB
dc.subjectMobilityen_GB
dc.subjectChoiceen_GB
dc.subjectResilienceen_GB
dc.subjectAdaptationen_GB
dc.subjectChinaen_GB
dc.titleMobility endowment and entitlements mediate resilience in rural livelihood systemsen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2019-06-24T15:25:10Z
dc.identifier.issn0959-3780
dc.descriptionThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from the publisher via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.identifier.journalGlobal Environmental Changeen_GB
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2018-12-16
rioxxterms.versionAMen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2019-01-01
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2019-06-24T15:21:01Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.panelCen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2018. This version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ 
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2018. This version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/