Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWhite, MP
dc.contributor.authorAlcock, I
dc.contributor.authorGrellier, J
dc.contributor.authorWheeler, BW
dc.contributor.authorHartig, T
dc.contributor.authorWarber, SL
dc.contributor.authorBone, A
dc.contributor.authorDepledge, MH
dc.contributor.authorFleming, LE
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-27T09:40:31Z
dc.date.issued2019-06-13
dc.description.abstractSpending time in natural environments can benefit health and well-being, but exposure-response relationships are under-researched. We examined associations between recreational nature contact in the last seven days and self-reported health and well-being. Participants (n = 19,806) were drawn from the Monitor of Engagement with the Natural Environment Survey (2014/15–2015/16); weighted to be nationally representative. Weekly contact was categorised using 60 min blocks. Analyses controlled for residential greenspace and other neighbourhood and individual factors. Compared to no nature contact last week, the likelihood of reporting good health or high well-being became significantly greater with contact ≥120 mins (e.g. 120–179 mins: ORs [95%CIs]: Health = 1.59 [1.31–1.92]; Well-being = 1.23 [1.08–1.40]). Positive associations peaked between 200–300 mins per week with no further gain. The pattern was consistent across key groups including older adults and those with long-term health issues. It did not matter how 120 mins of contact a week was achieved (e.g. one long vs. several shorter visits/week). Prospective longitudinal and intervention studies are a critical next step in developing possible weekly nature exposure guidelines comparable to those for physical activity.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institute for Health Research (NIHR)en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 9, article 7730en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/s41598-019-44097-3
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/37706
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherNature Researchen_GB
dc.rights© Te Author(s) 2019. Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.en_GB
dc.titleSpending at least 120 minutes a week in nature is associated with good health and wellbeingen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2019-06-27T09:40:31Z
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available on open access from Nature Research via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.identifier.eissn2045-2322
dc.identifier.journalScientific Reportsen_GB
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2019-05-08
exeter.funder::National Institute for Health Research (NIHR)en_GB
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2019-05-08
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2019-06-27T09:38:35Z
refterms.versionFCDVoR
refterms.dateFOA2019-06-27T09:40:36Z
refterms.panelAen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© Te Author(s) 2019. Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © Te Author(s) 2019. Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.