dc.contributor.author | Creese, BA | |
dc.contributor.author | Griffiths, A | |
dc.contributor.author | Brooker, H | |
dc.contributor.author | Corbett, A | |
dc.contributor.author | Aarsland, D | |
dc.contributor.author | Ballard, C | |
dc.contributor.author | Ismail, Z | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-07-19T06:29:12Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019-09-17 | |
dc.description.abstract | Objectives: In this large population study we set out to examine the profile of Mild Behavioral Impairment using the Mild Behavioral Impairment Checklist (MBI-C), and explore its factor structure when employed as a self-report and informant rated tool. Design: Population based cohort study. Setting: Online testing via the PROTECT study (http://www.protectstudy.org.uk) Participants: 5,742 participant-informant dyads. Measurements: Both participants and informants completed the MBI-C. The factor structure of the MBI-C was evaluated by exploratory factor analysis (EFA). Results: The most common MBI-C items as rated by self-report and informants related to affective dysregulation (mood/anxiety symptoms), being present in 34% and 38% of the sample respectively. The least common were items relating to abnormal thoughts and perception (psychotic symptoms) (present in 3 and 6% of the sample respectively). There were only weak correlations between self-report and informant-report MBI-C responses. EFA for both sets of respondent answers indicated a five-factor solution for the MBI-C was appropriate, reflecting the hypothesized structure of the MBI-C. Conclusion: This is the largest and most detailed report on the frequency of MBI symptoms in a non-dementia sample. The full spectrum of MBI symptoms was present in our sample, whether rated by self-report or informant report. However, we show that the MBI-C performs differently in self-report versus informant-report situations, which may have important implications for the use of the questionnaire in clinic and research. | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) | en_GB |
dc.identifier.citation | Published online 17 September 2019 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1017/S1041610219001200 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10871/38040 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) | en_GB |
dc.rights.embargoreason | Under embargo until 17 March 2020 in compliance with publisher policy | en_GB |
dc.rights | © International Psychogeriatric Association 2019 | |
dc.subject | MBI-C | en_GB |
dc.subject | Mild Behavioral Impairment | en_GB |
dc.subject | Dementia | en_GB |
dc.subject | SCD | en_GB |
dc.title | Profile of mild behavioral impairment and factor structure of the Mild Behavioral Impairment Checklist in cognitively normal older adults | en_GB |
dc.type | Article | en_GB |
dc.date.available | 2019-07-19T06:29:12Z | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1041-6102 | |
dc.description | This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from CUP via the DOI in this record | en_GB |
dc.identifier.journal | International Psychogeriatrics | en_GB |
dc.rights.uri | http://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved | en_GB |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2019-07-18 | |
rioxxterms.version | AM | en_GB |
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate | 2019-07-18 | |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | en_GB |
refterms.dateFCD | 2019-07-18T18:15:42Z | |
refterms.versionFCD | AM | |
refterms.dateFOA | 2020-03-17T00:00:00Z | |
refterms.panel | A | en_GB |