Global review of shark and ray entanglement in anthropogenic marine debris
dc.contributor.author | Parton, KJ | |
dc.contributor.author | Galloway, TS | |
dc.contributor.author | Godley, BJ | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-07-25T11:46:33Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019-07-04 | |
dc.description.abstract | Numerous marine taxa become entangled in anthropogenic marine debris, including cartilaginous fishes (class: Chondrichthyes, e.g. elasmobranchs [sharks, skates and rays], holocephalans [chimaeras]). Here we review research that has been conducted on the susceptibility of these taxa to entanglement in marine debris by conducting a systematic literature review complemented by novel data collection from the social media site Twitter. Our literature review yielded 47 published elasmobranch entanglement events (N = 557 animals) in 26 scientific papers, with 16 different families and 34 species in all 3 major ocean basins affected. The most common entangling objects were ghost fishing gear (74% of animals) followed by polypropylene strapping bands (11% of animals), with other entangling materials such as circular plastic debris, polythene bags and rubber tyres comprising 1% of total entangled animals. Most cases were from the Pacific and Atlantic oceans (49 and 46%, respectively), with a bias towards the USA (44% of animals), the UK (30% of animals) and South Africa (10% of animals). While investigating Twitter, we found 74 cases of elasmobranch entanglement, representing 14 families and 26 species. On Twitter, ghost fishing gear was again the most common entangling material (94.9% of animals), with the majority of entanglement records originating from the Atlantic Ocean (89.4% of total entangled animals). Entanglement in marine debris is symptomatic of a degraded marine environment and is a clear animal welfare issue. Our evidence suggests, however, that this issue is likely a far lesser threat to this taxon than direct or indirect take in marine fisheries. We highlight a relative paucity of scientific data on this subject and recommend a standardisation of reporting in an attempt to accurately quantify elasmobranch entanglement risks and locate interaction hotspots. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.citation | Vol. 39, pp. 173-190 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.3354/esr00964 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10871/38111 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | Inter Research | en_GB |
dc.rights | © The authors 2019. Open Access under Creative Commons by Attribution Licence. Use, distribution and reproduction are unrestricted. Authors and original publication must be credited. | en_GB |
dc.subject | sharks | en_GB |
dc.subject | rays | en_GB |
dc.subject | Elasmobranch | en_GB |
dc.subject | Marine debris | en_GB |
dc.subject | Ghost fishing | en_GB |
dc.subject | Entanglement | en_GB |
dc.title | Global review of shark and ray entanglement in anthropogenic marine debris | en_GB |
dc.type | Article | en_GB |
dc.date.available | 2019-07-25T11:46:33Z | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1613-4796 | |
dc.description | This is the final version. Available on open access from Inter Research via the DOI in this record | en_GB |
dc.identifier.journal | Endangered Species Research | en_GB |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | en_GB |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2019-04-25 | |
rioxxterms.version | VoR | en_GB |
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate | 2019-04-25 | |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | en_GB |
refterms.dateFCD | 2019-07-25T10:13:28Z | |
refterms.versionFCD | VoR | |
refterms.dateFOA | 2019-07-25T11:46:35Z | |
refterms.panel | A | en_GB |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © The authors 2019. Open Access under Creative Commons by
Attribution Licence. Use, distribution and reproduction are unrestricted. Authors and original publication must be credited.