A rapid and quantitative technique for assessing IgG monomeric purity, calibrated with the NISTmAb reference material
dc.contributor.author | Reader, P | |
dc.contributor.author | Olkhov, R | |
dc.contributor.author | Reeksting, S | |
dc.contributor.author | Lubben, A | |
dc.contributor.author | Hyde, C | |
dc.contributor.author | Shaw, A | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-08-05T07:44:54Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019-08-02 | |
dc.description.abstract | The fraction of intact monomer in a sample (moles/moles), the monomeric purity, is measured as a quality control in therapeutic monoclonal antibodies but is often unknown in research samples and remains a major source of variation in quantitative antibody-based techniques such as immunoassay development. Here, we describe a novel multiplex technique for estimating the monomeric purity and antigen affinity of research grade antibody samples. Light scattering was used to simultaneously observe the mass of antibody binding to biosensor surfaces functionalised with antigen (revealing Fab binding kinetics) or protein A/G (PAG). Initial estimates of monomeric purity in 7 antibody samples including a therapeutic infliximab biosimilar were estimated by observing a mass deficit on the PAG surface compared to the NISTmAb standard of high monomeric purity. Monomeric purity estimates were improved in a second step by observing the mass of antigen binding to the mass of antibody on the PAG surface. The NISTmAb and infliximab biosimilar displayed tightly controlled stoichiometries for antigen binding of 1.31 ± 0.57 and 1.71 ± 0.16 (95% confidence interval)—within the theoretical limit of 1–2 antigens per antibody depending on avidity. The other antibodies in the panel displayed antigen binding stoichiometries in the range 0.06–1.15, attributed to lower monomeric purity. The monomeric purity estimates were verified by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI), the gold standard technique for structural characterization of antibodies. ESI data indicated that the NISTmAb and infliximab biosimilar samples had monomeric purity values of 93.5% and 94.7%, respectively, whilst the research grade samples were significantly lower (54–89%). Our results demonstrate rapid quality control testing for monomeric purity of antibody samples (< 15 min) which could improve the reproducibility of antibody-based experiments. | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | EPSRC | en_GB |
dc.identifier.citation | Published online 2 August 2019 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s00216-019-02029-0 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10871/38200 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | Springer Verlag | en_GB |
dc.rights | (C) The Author(s) 2019. Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons At tribution 4.0 International License (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. | en_GB |
dc.subject | Biosensor | en_GB |
dc.subject | Antibody | en_GB |
dc.subject | Monomeric purity | en_GB |
dc.subject | NISTmAb | en_GB |
dc.subject | Immunoassay | en_GB |
dc.title | A rapid and quantitative technique for assessing IgG monomeric purity, calibrated with the NISTmAb reference material | en_GB |
dc.type | Article | en_GB |
dc.date.available | 2019-08-05T07:44:54Z | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0937-0633 | |
dc.description | This is the final version. Available from Springer via the DOI in this record. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.journal | Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry | en_GB |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | en_GB |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2019-07-10 | |
rioxxterms.version | VoR | en_GB |
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate | 2019-08-02 | |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | en_GB |
refterms.dateFCD | 2019-08-03T10:46:07Z | |
refterms.versionFCD | AM | |
refterms.dateFOA | 2019-08-05T07:44:58Z | |
refterms.panel | A | en_GB |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as (C) The Author(s) 2019. Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative
Commons At tribution 4.0 International License (http://
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use,
distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give
appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link
to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.