Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorReader, P
dc.contributor.authorOlkhov, R
dc.contributor.authorReeksting, S
dc.contributor.authorLubben, A
dc.contributor.authorHyde, C
dc.contributor.authorShaw, A
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-05T07:44:54Z
dc.date.issued2019-08-02
dc.description.abstractThe fraction of intact monomer in a sample (moles/moles), the monomeric purity, is measured as a quality control in therapeutic monoclonal antibodies but is often unknown in research samples and remains a major source of variation in quantitative antibody-based techniques such as immunoassay development. Here, we describe a novel multiplex technique for estimating the monomeric purity and antigen affinity of research grade antibody samples. Light scattering was used to simultaneously observe the mass of antibody binding to biosensor surfaces functionalised with antigen (revealing Fab binding kinetics) or protein A/G (PAG). Initial estimates of monomeric purity in 7 antibody samples including a therapeutic infliximab biosimilar were estimated by observing a mass deficit on the PAG surface compared to the NISTmAb standard of high monomeric purity. Monomeric purity estimates were improved in a second step by observing the mass of antigen binding to the mass of antibody on the PAG surface. The NISTmAb and infliximab biosimilar displayed tightly controlled stoichiometries for antigen binding of 1.31 ± 0.57 and 1.71 ± 0.16 (95% confidence interval)—within the theoretical limit of 1–2 antigens per antibody depending on avidity. The other antibodies in the panel displayed antigen binding stoichiometries in the range 0.06–1.15, attributed to lower monomeric purity. The monomeric purity estimates were verified by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI), the gold standard technique for structural characterization of antibodies. ESI data indicated that the NISTmAb and infliximab biosimilar samples had monomeric purity values of 93.5% and 94.7%, respectively, whilst the research grade samples were significantly lower (54–89%). Our results demonstrate rapid quality control testing for monomeric purity of antibody samples (< 15 min) which could improve the reproducibility of antibody-based experiments.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipEPSRCen_GB
dc.identifier.citationPublished online 2 August 2019en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00216-019-02029-0
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/38200
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherSpringer Verlagen_GB
dc.rights(C) The Author(s) 2019. Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons At tribution 4.0 International License (http:/ / creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.en_GB
dc.subjectBiosensoren_GB
dc.subjectAntibodyen_GB
dc.subjectMonomeric purityen_GB
dc.subjectNISTmAben_GB
dc.subjectImmunoassayen_GB
dc.titleA rapid and quantitative technique for assessing IgG monomeric purity, calibrated with the NISTmAb reference materialen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2019-08-05T07:44:54Z
dc.identifier.issn0937-0633
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available from Springer via the DOI in this record.en_GB
dc.identifier.journalAnalytical and Bioanalytical Chemistryen_GB
dc.rights.urihttp:/ /creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2019-07-10
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2019-08-02
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2019-08-03T10:46:07Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.dateFOA2019-08-05T07:44:58Z
refterms.panelAen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

(C) The Author(s) 2019. Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative
Commons At tribution 4.0 International License (http:/ /
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use,
distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give
appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link
to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as (C) The Author(s) 2019. Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons At tribution 4.0 International License (http:/ / creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.