Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSkákala, J
dc.contributor.authorFord, D
dc.contributor.authorBrewin, RJW
dc.contributor.authorMcEwan, R
dc.contributor.authorKay, S
dc.contributor.authorTaylor, B
dc.contributor.authorde Mora, L
dc.contributor.authorCiavatta, S
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-07T10:16:28Z
dc.date.issued2018-08-01
dc.description.abstractThis paper proposes the use of assimilation of phytoplankton functional types (PFTs) surface chlorophyll for operational forecasting of biogeochemistry on the North-West European (NWE) Shelf. We explicitly compare the 5-day forecasting skill of three runs of a physical-biogeochemical model: (a) a free reference run, (b) a run with daily data assimilation (DA) of total surface chlorophyll (ChlTot), and (c) a run with daily PFTs DA. We show that small total chlorophyll model bias hides comparatively large biases in PFTs chlorophyll, which ChlTot DA fails to correct. This is because the ChlTot DA splits the assimilated total chlorophyll into PFTs by preserving their simulated ratios, rather than taking account of the observed PFT concentrations. Unlike ChlTot DA, PFTs DA substantially improves model representation of PFTs chlorophyll. During forecasting the DA reanalysis skill in representing PFTs chlorophyll degrades toward the free run skill; however, PFTs DA outperforms free run within the whole 5-day forecasting period. We validated our results with in situ data, and we demonstrated that (in both DA cases) the DA substantially improves the model representation of CO 2 fugacity (PFTs DA more than ChlTot DA). ChlTot DA has a positive impact on the representation of silicate, while the PFTs DA seems to have a negative impact. The impact of DA on nitrate and phosphate is not significant. The implications of using a univariate assimilation method, which preserves the phytoplankton stochiometry, and the impact of model biases on the nonassimilated variables are discussed.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipCopernicus Marine Environment Monitoring Serviceen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipUnited Kingdom Natural Environment Research Council's National Centre for Earth Observationen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipEuropean Unionen_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 123, pp. 5230 - 5247en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1029/2018JC014153
dc.identifier.grantnumber678396en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/38260
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherAmerican Geophysical Unionen_GB
dc.rights©2018. American Geophysical Union and Crown copyright. This article is published with the permission of the Controller of HMSO and the Queen's Printer for Scotland.en_GB
dc.subjectdata assimilationen_GB
dc.subjectphytoplankton functional typesen_GB
dc.subjectnorthwest European Shelfen_GB
dc.subjectforecastingen_GB
dc.titleThe Assimilation of Phytoplankton Functional Types for Operational Forecasting in the Northwest European Shelfen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2019-08-07T10:16:28Z
dc.identifier.issn2169-9275
dc.descriptionThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from American Geophysical Union via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.identifier.journalJournal of Geophysical Research: Oceansen_GB
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserveden_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2018-06-18
rioxxterms.versionAMen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2018-08-01
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2019-08-07T10:13:03Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.dateFOA2019-08-07T10:16:31Z
refterms.panelCen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record