Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGordelier, TJ
dc.contributor.authorThies, P
dc.contributor.authorTurner, L
dc.contributor.authorJohanning, L
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-16T11:15:11Z
dc.date.issued2019-07-29
dc.description.abstractPurpose Additive manufacturing or “3D printing” is a rapidly expanding sector and is moving from a prototyping service to a manufacturing service in its own right. With a significant increase in sales, fused deposition modelling (FDM) printers are now the most prevalent 3D printer on the market. The increase in commercial manufacturing necessitates an improved understanding of how to optimise the FDM printing process for various product mechanical properties. This paper aims to identify optimum print parameters for the FDM process to achieve maximum tensile strength through a review of recent studies in this field. Design/methodology/approach The effect of the governing printing parameters on the tensile strength of printed samples will be considered, including material selection, print orientation, raster angle, air gap and layer height. Findings The key findings include material recommendations, such as the use of emerging print materials like polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK), to produce samples with tensile strength over 200 per cent that of conventional materials such as acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS). Amongst other parameters, it is shown that printing in the “upright” orientation should be avoided (samples can be up to 50 per cent weaker in this orientation) and air gap and raster width should be concurrently optimised to ensure good “inter-raster” bonding. The optimal choice of raster angle depends on print material; in ABS for example, selecting a 0° raster angle over a 90° angle can increase tensile strength by up to 100 per cent. Originality/value The paper conclusions provide researchers and practitioners with an up-to-date, single point reference, highlighting a series of robust recommendations to optimise the tensile strength of FDM-printed samples. Improving the mechanical performance of FDM-printed samples will support the continued growth of this technology as a viable production technique.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipEuropean Regional Development Fund (ERDF)en_GB
dc.identifier.citationPublished online 29 July 2019en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1108/RPJ-07-2018-0183
dc.identifier.grantnumber05R16P00381en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/38357
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherEmeralden_GB
dc.rights© 2019 Emeralden_GB
dc.subjectFDMen_GB
dc.subjectTensile Strengthen_GB
dc.subjectABSen_GB
dc.subjectPLAen_GB
dc.subjectRaster Angleen_GB
dc.subjectPrint Orientationen_GB
dc.titleOptimising the FDM additive manufacturing process to achieve maximum tensile strength: a state-of-the-art reviewen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2019-08-16T11:15:11Z
dc.descriptionThis is the author accepted manucript. The final version is available from Emerald via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.identifier.eissn1758-7670
dc.identifier.journalRapid Prototyping Journalen_GB
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserveden_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2018-12-14
exeter.funder::European Regional Development Fund (ERDF)en_GB
rioxxterms.versionAMen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2019-07-29
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2019-08-16T10:41:11Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.dateFOA2019-08-16T11:15:14Z
refterms.panelBen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record