Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMarimon-Junior, BH
dc.contributor.authorHay, JDV
dc.contributor.authorOliveras, I
dc.contributor.authorJancoski, H
dc.contributor.authorUmetsu, RK
dc.contributor.authorFeldpausch, TR
dc.contributor.authorGalbraith, DR
dc.contributor.authorGloor, EU
dc.contributor.authorPhillips, OL
dc.contributor.authorMarimon, BS
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-22T10:18:28Z
dc.date.issued2019-08-27
dc.description.abstractBackground and aims: We explored the hypothesis that low soil water-holding capacity is the main factor driving the monodominance of Brosimum rubescens in a monodominant forest in Southern Amazonia. Tropical monodominant forests are rare ecosystems with low diversity and high dominance of a single tree species. The causes of this atypical condition are still poorly understood. Some studies have shown a relationship between monodominance and waterlogging or soil attributes, while others have concluded that edaphic factors have little or no explanatory value, but none has accounted for soil-moisture variation other than waterlogging. This study is the first to explicitly explore how low soil water-holding capacity influences the monodominance of tropical forests. Methods: We conducted in situ measurements of vertical soil moisture using electrical resistance collected over 1 year at 0–5; 35–40 and 75–80 cm depths in a B. rubescens monodominant forest and in an adjacent mixed-species forest in the Amazon-Cerrado transition zone, Brazil. Minimum leaf water potential (Ψmin) of the seven most common species, including B. rubescens, and soil water-holding capacity for both forests were determined. Results: The vertical soil moisture decay pattern was similar in both forests for all depths. However, the slightly higher water availability in the monodominant forest and Ψmin similarity between B. rubescens and nearby mixed forest species indicate that low water-availability does not cause the monodominance. Conclusions: We reject the hypothesis that monodominance of B. rubescens is primarily determined by low soil water-holding capacity, reinforcing the idea that monodominance in tropical forests is not determined by a single factor.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipBrazilian National Council of Science and Technology (CNPq)en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipProject USA-NAS/PEERen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipProject ReFlor FAPEMATen_GB
dc.identifier.citationPublished online 27 August 2019en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11104-019-04257-w
dc.identifier.grantnumber401279en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumber457602en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumberPQ-2en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumberPQ-1en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumber441244/2016-5en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumberPGA-2000005316en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumber0589267/2016en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/39294
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherSpringer Verlag for Royal Netherlands Society of Agricultural Scienceen_GB
dc.rights.embargoreasonUnder embargo until 27 August 2019 in compliance with publisher policyen_GB
dc.rights© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019en_GB
dc.subjectSoil moistureen_GB
dc.subjectMonodominant speciesen_GB
dc.subjectWater stressen_GB
dc.subjectSoil gravel contenten_GB
dc.subjectPermanent wilting pointen_GB
dc.subjectTotal porosityen_GB
dc.titleSoil water-holding capacity and monodominance in Southern Amazon tropical forestsen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2019-10-22T10:18:28Z
dc.identifier.issn0032-079X
dc.descriptionThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Springer Verlag via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.identifier.journalPlant and Soilen_GB
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserveden_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2019-08-07
rioxxterms.versionAMen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2019-08-07
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2019-10-22T10:13:12Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.dateFOA2020-08-26T23:00:00Z
refterms.panelCen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record