Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPham, TM
dc.contributor.authorAbel, GA
dc.contributor.authorGomez-Cano, M
dc.contributor.authorLyratzopoulos, G
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-29T11:15:38Z
dc.date.issued2019-05-02
dc.description.abstractBackground: Patient experience surveys are important tools for improving the quality of cancer services, but the representativeness of responders is a concern. Increasingly, patient surveys that traditionally used postal questionnaires are incorporating an online response option. However, the characteristics and experience ratings of online responders are poorly understood. Objective: We sought to examine predictors of postal or online response mode, and associations with patient experience in the (English) Cancer Patient Experience Survey. Methods: We analyzed data from 71,186 patients with cancer recently treated in National Health Service hospitals who responded to the Cancer Patient Experience Survey 2015. Using logistic regression, we explored patient characteristics associated with greater probability of online response and whether, after adjustment for patient characteristics, the online response was associated with a more or less critical evaluation of cancer care compared to the postal response. Results: Of the 63,134 patients included in the analysis, 4635 (7.34%) responded online. In an adjusted analysis, male (women vs men: odds ratio [OR] 0.50, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.46-0.54), younger (<55 vs 65-74 years: OR 3.49, 95% CI 3.21-3.80), least deprived (most vs least deprived quintile: OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.51-0.64), and nonwhite (nonwhite vs white ethnic group: OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.24-1.51) patients were more likely to respond online. Compared to postal responders, after adjustment for patient characteristics, online responders had a higher likelihood of reporting an overall satisfied experience of care (OR 1.24, 95% CI 1.16-1.32). For 34 of 49 other items, online responders more frequently reported a less than positive experience of care (8 reached statistical significance), and the associations were positive for the remaining 15 of 49 items (2 reached statistical significance). Conclusions: In the context of a national survey of patients with cancer, online and postal responders tend to differ in their characteristics and rating of satisfaction. Associations between online response and reported experience were generally small and mostly nonsignificant, but with a tendency toward less than positive ratings, although not consistently. Whether the observed associations between response mode and reported experience were causal needs to be examined using experimental survey designs.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipMacmillan Cancer Supporten_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipCancer Research UKen_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 21 (5), article e11855en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.2196/11855
dc.identifier.grantnumber5995414en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumberC18081/A18180en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/39366
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherJournal of Medical Internet Research / JMIR Publicationsen_GB
dc.rights©Tra My Pham, Gary A Abel, Mayam Gomez-Cano, Georgios Lyratzopoulos. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 02.05.2019. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.en_GB
dc.subjectcanceren_GB
dc.subjectpatient surveyen_GB
dc.subjectsatisfactionen_GB
dc.subjectexperienceen_GB
dc.subjectonline responseen_GB
dc.subjectWeben_GB
dc.subjectinterneten_GB
dc.titlePredictors of postal or online response mode and associations with patient experience and satisfaction in the english cancer patient experience surveyen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2019-10-29T11:15:38Z
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available on open access from Journal of Medical Internet Research via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.identifier.eissn1438-8871
dc.identifier.journalJournal of Medical Internet Researchen_GB
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2019-01-21
exeter.funder::Macmillanen_GB
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2019-05-02
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2019-10-29T11:13:08Z
refterms.versionFCDVoR
refterms.dateFOA2019-10-29T11:15:42Z
refterms.panelAen_GB
refterms.depositExceptionpublishedGoldOA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

©Tra My Pham, Gary A Abel, Mayam Gomez-Cano, Georgios Lyratzopoulos. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 02.05.2019.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as ©Tra My Pham, Gary A Abel, Mayam Gomez-Cano, Georgios Lyratzopoulos. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 02.05.2019. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.