Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBallard, C
dc.contributor.authorOrrell, M
dc.contributor.authorZhong, SY
dc.contributor.authorMoniz-Cook, E
dc.contributor.authorStafford, J
dc.contributor.authorWhittaker, R
dc.contributor.authorWoods, B
dc.contributor.authorCorbett, A
dc.contributor.authorGarrod, L
dc.contributor.authorKhan, Z
dc.contributor.authorWoodward-Carlton, B
dc.contributor.authorWenborn, J
dc.contributor.authorFossey, J
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-07T13:18:18Z
dc.date.issued2015-11-20
dc.description.abstractObjective: This study evaluated the impact of antipsychotic review, social interaction, and exercise, in conjunction with person-centered care, on antipsychotic use, agitation, and depression in people with dementia living in nursing homes. Method: A cluster-randomized factorial controlled trial with two replications was conducted in people with dementia in 16 U.K. nursing homes. All homes received training in personcentered care. Eight homes were randomly assigned to antipsychotic review, to a social interaction intervention, and to an exercise in tervention for9months, with most homes as signed to more than one intervention. The primary outcome measures were antipsychotic use, agitation, and depression. Secondary outcome measures were overall neuropsychiatric symptoms and mortality. Results: Antipsychotic review significantly reduced antipsychotic use by 50% (odds ratio 0.17, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.05 to 0.60). Antipsychotic review plus the social interaction intervention significantly reduced mortality (odds ratio 0.26, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.51) compared with the group receiving neither. The group receiving antipsychotic review but not the social intervention showed significantly worse outcome in neuropsychiatric symptoms compared with the group receiving neither (score difference +7.37, 95% CI 1.53 to 13.22). This detrimental impact was mitigated by con current delivery of the social intervention(20.44, CI24.39to 3.52). The exercise intervention significantly improved neuropsychiatric symptoms (23.59, 95% CI 27.08 to 20.09) but not depression (21.21, CI 24.35 to 1.93). None of the interventions had a significant impact specifically on agitation. Conclusions: While reductions in antipsychotic use can be achieved by using a "real world" intervention, this may not be of benefit to people with dementia in the current climate of more judicious prescribing unless nonpharmacological interventions such as social interaction or exercise are provided in parallel.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institute for Health Research (NIHR)en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 173 (3), pp. 252 - 262en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1176/appi.ajp.2015.15010130
dc.identifier.grantnumberRP-PG-0608-10133en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/39559
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherAmerican Psychiatric Publishingen_GB
dc.rights© 2015 American Psychiatric Publishingen_GB
dc.titleImpact of Antipsychotic Review and Nonpharmacological Intervention on Antipsychotic Use, Neuropsychiatric Symptoms, and Mortality in People With Dementia Living in Nursing Homes: A Factorial Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial by the Well-Being and Health for People With Dementia (WHELD) Programen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2019-11-07T13:18:18Z
dc.identifier.issn0002-953X
dc.descriptionThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from American Psychiatric Publishing via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.identifier.journalAmerican Journal of Psychiatryen_GB
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserveden_GB
pubs.euro-pubmed-idMED:26585409
dcterms.dateAccepted2015-07-27
rioxxterms.versionAMen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2015-11-20
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2019-11-07T13:15:40Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.dateFOA2019-11-07T13:18:21Z
refterms.panelAen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record