Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFinnegan, NJ
dc.contributor.authorBroudy, KN
dc.contributor.authorNereson, AL
dc.contributor.authorRoering, JJ
dc.contributor.authorHandwerger, AL
dc.contributor.authorBennett, G
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-20T15:58:49Z
dc.date.issued2019-09-20
dc.description.abstractTo explore the sensitivity of rivers to blocking from landslide debris, we exploit two similar geomorphic settings in California's Franciscan mélange where slow-moving landslides, often referred to as earthflows, impinge on river channels with drainage areas that differ by a factor of 30. Analysis of valley widths and river long profiles over ∼19 km of Alameda Creek (185 km2 drainage area) and Arroyo Hondo (200 km2 drainage area) in central California shows a very consistent picture in which earthflows that intersect these channels force tens of meters of gravel aggradation for kilometers upstream, leading to apparently long-lived sediment storage and channel burial at these sites. In contrast, over a ∼30 km section of the Eel River (5547 km2 drainage area), there are no knickpoints or aggradation upstream of locations where earthflows impinge on its channel. Hydraulic and hydrologic data from United States Geological Survey (USGS) gages on Arroyo Hondo and the Eel River, combined with measured size distributions of boulders input by landslides for both locations, suggest that landslide derived boulders are not mobile at either site during the largest floods (>2-year recurrence) with field-measured flow depths. We therefore argue that boulder transport capacity is an unlikely explanation for the observed difference in sensitivity to landslide inputs. At the same time, we find that earthflow fluxes per unit channel width are nearly identical for Oak Ridge earthflow on Arroyo Hondo, where evidence for blocking is clear, and for the Boulder Creek earthflow on the Eel River, where evidence for blocking is absent. These observations suggest that boulder supply is also an unlikely explanation for the observed morphological differences along the two rivers. Instead, we argue that the dramatically different sensitivity of the two locations to landslide blocking is related to differences in channel width relative to typical seasonal displacements of earthflows. A synthesis of seasonal earthflow displacements in the Franciscan mélange shows that the channel width of the Eel River is ∼5 times larger than the largest annual seasonal displacement. In contrast, during wet winters, earthflows are capable of crossing the entire channel width of Arroyo Hondo and Alameda Creek. In support of this interpretation, satellite imagery shows that immobile earthflow-derived boulders are generally confined to the edges of the channel on the Eel River. By contrast, immobile earthflow-derived boulders jam the entire channel on Arroyo Hondo. Our results imply that lower drainage area reaches of earthflow-dominated catchments may be particularly prone to blocking. By inhibiting the upstream propagation of base-level signals, valley-blocking earthflows may therefore promote the formation of so-called “relict topography”.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Science Foundationen_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 7, pp. 879 - 894en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.5194/esurf-7-879-2019
dc.identifier.grantnumberEAR-1658800en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumberEAR-1613122en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/39632
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherEuropean Geosciences Union (EGU)en_GB
dc.rights© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.en_GB
dc.titleRiver channel width controls blocking by slow-moving landslides in California's Franciscan melangeen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2019-11-20T15:58:49Z
dc.identifier.issn2196-6311
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available from European Geosciences Union via the DOI in this record. en_GB
dc.identifier.journalEarth Surface Dynamicsen_GB
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2019-08-12
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2019-09-20
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2019-11-20T15:55:38Z
refterms.versionFCDVoR
refterms.dateFOA2019-11-20T15:58:52Z
refterms.panelCen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.