Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBrown, A
dc.contributor.authorLowe, C
dc.contributor.authorShutler, J
dc.contributor.authorTyler, C
dc.contributor.authorLilley, M
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-25T12:05:10Z
dc.date.issued2019-12-17
dc.description.abstractAquaculture is the fastest growing food sector globally and protein provisioning from aquaculture now exceeds that from wild capture fisheries. There is clear potential for the further expansion of marine aquaculture (mariculture), but there are associated risks. Some naturally occurring algae can proliferate under certain environmental conditions, causing deoxygenation of seawater, or releasing toxic compounds (phycotoxins), which can harm wild and cultured finfish and shellfish, and also human consumers. The impacts of these so-called ‘harmful algal blooms’ (HABs) amount to approximately 8 $billion/yr globally, due to mass mortalities in finfish, harvesting bans preventing the sale of shellfish that have accumulated unsafe levels of HAB phycotoxins, and unavoided human health costs. Here we provide a critical review and analysis of HAB impacts on mariculture (and wild capture fisheries) and recommend research to identify ways to minimise their impacts to the industry. We examine causal factors for HAB development in inshore versus offshore locations and consider how mariculture itself, in its various forms, may exacerbate or mitigate HAB risk. From a management perspective, there is considerable scope for strategic siting of offshore mariculture and holistic Environmental Approaches for Aquaculture, such as offsetting nutrient outputs from finfish farming, via the co-location of extractive shellfish and macroalgae. Such pre-emptive, ecosystem-based approaches are preferable to reactive physical, chemical or microbiological control measures aiming to remove or neutralise HABs and their phycotxins. To facilitate mariculture expansion and long-term sustainability, it is also essential to evaluate HAB risk in conjunction with climate change.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipEuropean Martime and Fisheries Fund (EMFF)en_GB
dc.identifier.citationPublished online 17 December 2019en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/raq.12403
dc.identifier.grantnumberENG2360en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/39780
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherWileyen_GB
dc.rights.embargoreasonUnder embargo until 18 December 2020 in compliance with publisher policyen_GB
dc.rights© 2019 Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd
dc.subjectfood productionen_GB
dc.subjectfood qualityen_GB
dc.subjectmaricultureen_GB
dc.subjectHABsen_GB
dc.subjectphycotoxinsen_GB
dc.subjectrisk mitigationen_GB
dc.titleAssessing risks and mitigating impacts of harmful algal blooms on mariculture and marine fisheriesen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2019-11-25T12:05:10Z
dc.identifier.issn1753-5123
dc.descriptionThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Wiley via the DOI in this nrecorden_GB
dc.identifier.journalReviews in Aquacultureen_GB
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserveden_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2019-11-18
rioxxterms.versionAMen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2019-11-18
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2019-11-25T10:33:54Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.panelAen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record