Using Cumulative Impact Mapping to Prioritize Marine Conservation Efforts in Equatorial Guinea
dc.contributor.author | Trew, BT | |
dc.contributor.author | Grantham, HS | |
dc.contributor.author | Barrientos, C | |
dc.contributor.author | Collins, T | |
dc.contributor.author | Doherty, PD | |
dc.contributor.author | Formia, A | |
dc.contributor.author | Godley, BJ | |
dc.contributor.author | Maxwell, SM | |
dc.contributor.author | Parnell, RJ | |
dc.contributor.author | Pikesley, SK | |
dc.contributor.author | Tilley, D | |
dc.contributor.author | Witt, MJ | |
dc.contributor.author | Metcalfe, K | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-11-28T11:59:12Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019-11-26 | |
dc.description.abstract | Marine biodiversity is under extreme pressure from anthropogenic activity globally, leading to calls to protect at least 10% of the world’s oceans within marine protected areas (MPAs) and other effective area-based conservation measures. Fulfilling such commitments, however, requires a detailed understanding of the distribution of potentially detrimental human activities, and their predicted impacts. One such approach that is being increasingly used to strengthen our understanding of human impacts is cumulative impact mapping; as it can help identify economic sectors with the greatest potential impact on species and ecosystems in order to prioritize conservation management strategies, providing clear direction for intervention. In this paper, we present the first local cumulative utilization impact mapping exercise for the Bioko-Corisco-Continental area of Equatorial Guinea’s Exclusive Economic Zone – situated in the Gulf of Guinea, one of the most important and least studied marine regions in the Eastern Central Atlantic. This study examines the potential impact of ten direct anthropogenic activities on a suite of key marine megafauna species and reveals that the most suitable habitats for these species, located on the continental shelf, are subject to the highest threat scores. However, in some coastal areas, the persistence of highly suitable habitat subject to lower threat scores suggests that there are still several strategic areas that are less impacted by human activity that may be suitable sites for protected area expansion. Highlighting both the areas with potentially the highest impact, and those with lower impact levels, as well as particularly damaging activities can inform the direction of future conservation initiatives in the region. | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | Waitt Foundation | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | Wildlife Conservation Society | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | Darwin Initiative | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | Waterloo Foundation | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | Marine Turtle Conservation Fund (United States Fish and Wildlife Service, United States Department of the Interior) | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | Vaalco Energy | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | Harvest Natural Resources | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | Sea World and Busch Gardens Conservation Fund | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | Tullow Oil | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | Old Dominion University | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | WWF | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | Wildlife Conservation Society | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | University of Exeter | en_GB |
dc.identifier.citation | Vol. 6, article 717 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.3389/fmars.2019.00717 | |
dc.identifier.grantnumber | 17-005/20-009/23-011/26-014 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.grantnumber | NE/R007039/1) | en_GB |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10871/39863 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | Frontiers Media | en_GB |
dc.rights | © 2019 Trew, Grantham, Barrientos, Collins, Doherty, Formia, Godley, Maxwell, Parnell, Pikesley, Tilley, Witt and Metcalfe. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. | en_GB |
dc.subject | cumulative impacts | en_GB |
dc.subject | Gulf of Guinea | en_GB |
dc.subject | marine conservation | en_GB |
dc.subject | marine protected areas | en_GB |
dc.subject | marine mammals | en_GB |
dc.subject | threat mapping | en_GB |
dc.subject | sea turtles | en_GB |
dc.subject | species distribution models | en_GB |
dc.title | Using Cumulative Impact Mapping to Prioritize Marine Conservation Efforts in Equatorial Guinea | en_GB |
dc.type | Article | en_GB |
dc.date.available | 2019-11-28T11:59:12Z | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2296-7745 | |
dc.description | This is the final version. Available on open access from Frontiers Media via the DOI in this record | en_GB |
dc.description | Data Availability Statement Ensemble ecological niche models (EENMs) and threat maps (anthropogenic footprint, cumulative impact, and cumulative utilization and impact) for each species (Atlantic humpback dolphin Sousa teuszii; bottlenose dolphin Tursiops truncatus; humpback whale Megaptera novaeangliae; leatherback Dermochelys coriacea; and olive ridley sea turtle Lepidochelys olivacea) are available from the Dryad Digital Repository doi: 10.5061/dryad.v6wwpzgr9 (Trew et al., 2019). | en_GB |
dc.identifier.journal | Frontiers in Marine Science | en_GB |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | en_GB |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2019-11-06 | |
rioxxterms.version | VoR | en_GB |
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate | 2019-11-26 | |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | en_GB |
refterms.dateFCD | 2019-11-28T11:52:00Z | |
refterms.versionFCD | VoR | |
refterms.dateFOA | 2019-11-28T11:59:25Z | |
refterms.panel | A | en_GB |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2019 Trew, Grantham, Barrientos, Collins, Doherty, Formia, Godley, Maxwell, Parnell, Pikesley, Tilley, Witt and Metcalfe. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.