Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSmith, JR
dc.contributor.authorGreaves, CJ
dc.contributor.authorThompson, JL
dc.contributor.authorTaylor, RS
dc.contributor.authorJones, M
dc.contributor.authorArmstrong, R
dc.contributor.authorMoorlock, S
dc.contributor.authorGriffin, A
dc.contributor.authorSolomon-Moore, E
dc.contributor.authorBiddle, MSY
dc.contributor.authorPrice, L
dc.contributor.authorAbraham, C
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-29T16:12:32Z
dc.date.issued2019-11-27
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: This two-site randomised trial compared the effectiveness of a voluntary sector-led, community-based diabetes prevention programme to a waiting-list control group at 6 months, and included an observational follow-up of the intervention arm to 12 months. METHODS: Adults aged 18-75 years at increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes due to elevated blood glucose and being overweight were recruited from primary care practices at two UK sites, with data collected in participants' homes or community venues. Participants were randomised using an online central allocation service. The intervention, comprising the prototype "Living Well, Taking Control" (LWTC) programme, involved four weekly two-hour group sessions held in local community venues to promote changes in diet and physical activity, plus planned follow-up contacts at two, three, six, nine and 12 months alongside 5 hours of additional activities/classes. Waiting list controls received usual care for 6 months before accessing the programme. The primary outcome was weight loss at 6 months. Secondary outcomes included glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), blood pressure, physical activity, diet, health status and well-being. Only researchers conducting analyses were blinded. RESULTS: The target sample of 314 participants (157 each arm) was largely representative of local populations, including 44% men, 26% from ethnic minorities and 33% living in deprived areas. Primary outcome data were available for 285 (91%) participants (141 intervention, 144 control). Between baseline and 6 months, intervention participants on average lost more weight than controls (- 1.7 kg, 95% CI - 2.59 to - 0.85). Higher attendance was associated with greater weight loss (- 3.0 kg, 95% CI - 4.5 to - 1.5). The prototype LWTC programme more than doubled the proportion of participants losing > 5% of their body weight (21% intervention vs. 8% control, OR 2.83, 95% CI 1.36 to 5.90) and improved self-reported dietary behaviour and health status. There were no impacts on HbA1c, blood pressure, physical activity and well-being at 6 months and, amongst intervention participants, few further changes from six to 12-months (e.g. average weight re-gain 0.36 kg, 95% CI - 0.20 to 0.91). There were no serious adverse events but four exercise-related injuries were reported in the intervention arm. CONCLUSIONS: This voluntary sector-led diabetes prevention programme reached a broad spectrum of the population and had modest effects on weight-related outcomes, but limited impacts on other diabetes risk factors. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registration number: ISRCTN70221670, 5 September 2014 Funder (National Institute for Health Research School for Public Health Research) project reference number: SPHR-EXE-PES-COM.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipNIHR School for Public Health Research “Public Health Practice Evaluation Scheme”en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 16, article 112en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12966-019-0877-3
dc.identifier.grantnumberSPHR-EXE-PES-COMen_GB
dc.identifier.other10.1186/s12966-019-0877-3
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/39886
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherBMC (Springer Nature)en_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31771589en_GB
dc.rights© The Author(s). 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, andreproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.en_GB
dc.subjectDiabetes preventionen_GB
dc.subjectDieten_GB
dc.subjectPhysical activityen_GB
dc.subjectRandomised controlled trialen_GB
dc.subjectVoluntary sectoren_GB
dc.subjectWeight lossen_GB
dc.titleThe community-based prevention of diabetes (ComPoD) study: a randomised, waiting list controlled trial of a voluntary sector-led diabetes prevention programme.en_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2019-11-29T16:12:32Z
exeter.place-of-publicationEnglanden_GB
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available from BMC/Springer Nature via the DOI in this record. en_GB
dc.identifier.journalInternational Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activityen_GB
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2019-11-06
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2019-11-27
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2019-11-29T16:08:11Z
refterms.versionFCDVoR
refterms.dateFOA2019-11-29T16:12:35Z
refterms.panelAen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© The Author(s). 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, andreproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © The Author(s). 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, andreproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.