Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSerrano-Ripoll, MJ
dc.contributor.authorRipoll, J
dc.contributor.authorLlobera, J
dc.contributor.authorValderas, JM
dc.contributor.authorPastor-Moreno, G
dc.contributor.authorOlry de Labry Lima, A
dc.contributor.authorRicci-Cabello, I
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-03T10:54:52Z
dc.date.issued2019-12-23
dc.description.abstractINTRODUCTION: Despite the enormous potential for adverse events in primary healthcare (PHC), the knowledge about how to improve patient safety in this context is still sparse. We describe the methods for the development and evaluation of an intervention targeted at PHC professionals to improve patient safety in Spanish PHC centres. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The intervention will consist in using the patient reported experiences and outcomes of safety in primary care (PREOS-PC) survey to gather patient-reported experiences and outcomes concerning the safety of the healthcare patients receive in their PHC centres, and feed that information back to the PHC professionals to help them identify opportunities for safer healthcare provision. The study will involve three stages. Stage 1 (developing the intervention) will involve: (i) qualitative study with 40 PHC providers to optimise the acceptability and perceived utility of the proposed intervention; (ii) Spanish translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the PREOS-PC survey; (iii) developing the intervention components; and (iv) developing an online tool to electronically administrate PREOS-PC and automatically generate feedback reports to PHC centres. Stage 2 (piloting the intervention) will involve a 3-month feasibility (one group pre-post) study in 10 PHC centres (500 patients, 260 providers). Stage 3 (evaluating the intervention) will involve: (i) a 12-month, two-arm, two-level cluster randomised controlled trial (1248 PHC professionals within 48 PHC centres; with randomisation at the centre level in a 1:1 ratio) to evaluate the impact of the intervention on patient safety culture (primary outcome), patient-reported safety experiences and outcomes (using the PREOS-PC survey), and avoidable hospitalisations; (ii) qualitative study with 20 PHC providers to evaluate the acceptability and perceived utility of the intervention and identify implementation barriers. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Balearic Islands (CEI IB: 3686/18) with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments. The results will be disseminated in peer-reviewed publications and national and international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03837912; pre-results.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipInstituto de Salud Carlos III (Spanish Ministry of Sciences, Innovation and Universities)en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 9, article e031367en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031367
dc.identifier.grantnumberCP17/00017en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/40217
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Groupen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31874872en_GB
dc.rights© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/en_GB
dc.subjecthealth servicesen_GB
dc.subjectmedical errorsen_GB
dc.subjectpatient safetyen_GB
dc.subjectprimary health careen_GB
dc.subjectquality in health careen_GB
dc.titleDevelopment and evaluation of an intervention based on the provision of patient feedback to improve patient safety in Spanish primary healthcare centres: study protocolen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2020-01-03T10:54:52Z
exeter.place-of-publicationEnglanden_GB
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available on open access from BMJ Publishing Group via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.identifier.eissn2044-6055
dc.identifier.journalBMJ Openen_GB
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2019-11-05
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2019-12-23
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2020-01-03T10:52:55Z
refterms.versionFCDVoR
refterms.dateFOA2020-01-03T10:54:58Z
refterms.panelAen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/