Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDavies, G
dc.contributor.authorGorman, R
dc.contributor.authorGreenhough, B
dc.contributor.authorHobson-West, P
dc.contributor.authorKirk, RGW
dc.contributor.authorMessage, R
dc.contributor.authorMyelnikov, D
dc.contributor.authorPalmer, A
dc.contributor.authorRoe, E
dc.contributor.authorAshall, V
dc.contributor.authorCrudgington, B
dc.contributor.authorMcGlacken, R
dc.contributor.authorPeres, S
dc.contributor.authorSkidmore, T
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-03T13:19:56Z
dc.date.issued2020-02-19
dc.description.abstractAnimals used in biological research and testing have become integrated into the trajectories of modern biomedicine, generating increased expectations for and connections between human and animal health. Animal research also remains controversial and its acceptability is contingent on a complex network of relations and assurances across science and society, which are both formally constituted through law and informal or assumed. In this paper, we propose these entanglements can be studied through an approach that understands animal research as a nexus spanning the domains of science, health, and animal welfare. We introduce this argument through, firstly, outlining some key challenges in UK debates around animal research, and secondly, reviewing the way nexus concepts have been used to connect issues in environmental research. Thirdly, we explore how existing social sciences and humanities scholarship on animal research tends to focus on different aspects of the connections between scientific research, human health, and animal welfare, which we suggest can be combined in a nexus approach. In the fourth section, we introduce our collaborative research on the animal research nexus, indicating how this approach can be used to study the history, governance, and changing sensibilities around UK laboratory animal research. We suggest the attention to complex connections in nexus approaches can be enriched through conversations with the social sciences and medical humanities in ways that deepen appreciation of the importance of path-dependency and contingency, inclusionsand exclusion in governance, and the affective dimension to research. In concluding, we reflect on the value of nexus thinking for developing research that is interdisciplinary, interactive, and reflexive in understanding how accounts of the histories and current relations of animal research have significant implications for how scientific practices, policy debates, and broad social contracts around animal research are being remade today.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipWellcome Trusten_GB
dc.identifier.citationPublished online 19 February 2020.en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/medhum-2019-011778
dc.identifier.grantnumber205393en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/40223
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Groupen_GB
dc.rights© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.en_GB
dc.titleThe Animal Research Nexus: A new approach to the connections between science, health, and animal welfareen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2020-01-03T13:19:56Z
dc.identifier.issn1468-215X
dc.descriptionThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from BMJ Publishing Group via the DOI in this record.en_GB
dc.identifier.journalMedical Humanitiesen_GB
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-01-02
exeter.funder::Wellcome Trusten_GB
rioxxterms.versionAMen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2020-01-02
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2020-01-03T12:50:16Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.dateFOA2020-03-20T16:53:14Z
refterms.panelCen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.