Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorOlsen, M
dc.contributor.authorZhelev, Z
dc.contributor.authorHunt, H
dc.contributor.authorPeters, JL
dc.contributor.authorBossuyt, P
dc.contributor.authorHyde, C
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-16T10:44:41Z
dc.date.issued2019-09-05
dc.description.abstractBackground: A variety of study designs are available to evaluate the accuracy of tests, but the terms used to describe these designs seem to lack clarity and standardization. We investigated if this was the case in the diagnostic guidance of the National Institute of Care and Health Excellence (NICE), an influential source of advice on the value of tests. Objectives: To describe the range of study design terms and labels used to distinguish study designs in NICE Diagnostic Guidance and the underlying evidence reports. Methods: We carefully examined all NICE Diagnostic Guidance that has been developed from inception in 2011 until 2018 and the corresponding diagnostic assessment reports that summarized the evidence, focusing on guidance where tests were considered for diagnosis. We abstracted labels used to describe study designs and investigated what labels were used when studies were weighted differently because of their design (in terms of validity of evidence), in relevant sections. We made a descriptive analysis to assess the range of labels and also categorized labels by design features. Results: From a total of 36 pieces of guidance, 20 (56%) were eligible and 17 (47%) were included in our analysis. We identified 53 unique design labels, of which 19 (36%) were specific to diagnostic test accuracy designs. These referred to a total of 12 study design features. Labels were used in assigning different weights to studies in seven of the reports (41%) but never in the guidance documents. Conclusion: Our study confirms a lack of clarity and standardization of test accuracy study design terms. There seems to be scope to reduce and harmonize the number of terms and still capture the design features that were deemed influential by those compiling the evidence reports. This should help decision makers in quickly identifying subgroups of included studies that should be weighted differently because their designs are more susceptible to bias.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipEuropean Union Horizon 2020en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 3, article 17en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s41512-019-0062-9
dc.identifier.grantnumber676207en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/40432
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherBMCen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31517065en_GB
dc.rights© The Author(s) 2019. Open Access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.en_GB
dc.subjectDiagnostic test accuracy study designen_GB
dc.subjectLabelsen_GB
dc.subjectNICE diagnostic guidanceen_GB
dc.subjectTerminologyen_GB
dc.titleUse of test accuracy study design labels in NICE's diagnostic guidanceen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2020-01-16T10:44:41Z
exeter.place-of-publicationEnglanden_GB
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available on open access from BMC via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.descriptionAvailability of data and materials: The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.en_GB
dc.identifier.eissn2397-7523
dc.identifier.journalDiagnostic and Prognostic Researchen_GB
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserveden_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2019-06-13
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2019-09-05
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2020-01-16T10:43:00Z
refterms.versionFCDVoR
refterms.dateFOA2020-01-16T10:44:54Z
refterms.panelAen_GB
refterms.depositExceptionpublishedGoldOA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record