Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMackay, E
dc.contributor.authorJohanning, L
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-30T13:16:45Z
dc.date.issued2020-02-06
dc.description.abstractAnalytical solutions for wave interaction with a vertical porous barrier are presented. The analytical solutions are derived using two different methods for taking the depth-average of the pressure drop across the porous barrier. Both solutions assume that the evanescent modes in the wave field can be neglected. The results from the analytical models are compared to results from an iterative boundary element method (BEM) model. The BEM model shows that neglecting evanescent modes is a reasonable assumption for long waves, but that for short waves the velocity through the porous wall from the evanescent modes can be up to 25% of the velocity from the progressive modes at the free surface. However, the effect of neglecting the evanescent modes has only a small effect on the depth-averaged velocity through porous wall and the analytical models derived using depth-averaged assumptions are shown to give good agreement with the BEM model for the reflection coefficient, horizontal force and overturning moment on the porous barrier. The analytical models are used to investigate the effects of the drag and inertia coefficients of the porous barrier on the behaviour of the solution. It is shown that for fixed values of the drag coefficient, wave frequency and amplitude, the solutions for the reflection coefficient lie on approximately semicircular arcs on the complex plane, with the position on the arc determined by the inertial coefficient. This places bounds on the size of the phase change in the reflected and transmitted wave which are possible. The analytical models are also used to derive the asymptotic behaviour of the solution in long and short waves. The implications of the results for more general cases of wave interaction with porous structures are discussed.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipEngineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC)en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 199, article 107032en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.107032
dc.identifier.grantnumberEP/R007519/1en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/40664
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherElsevieren_GB
dc.rights© 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).en_GB
dc.subjectPorousen_GB
dc.subjectSlotteden_GB
dc.subjectPerforateden_GB
dc.subjectPile breakwateren_GB
dc.subjectBoundary element methoden_GB
dc.titleComparison of analytical and numerical solutions for wave interaction with a vertical porous barrieren_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2020-01-30T13:16:45Z
dc.identifier.issn0029-8018
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available on open access from Elsevier via the DOI in this record.en_GB
dc.identifier.journalOcean Engineeringen_GB
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-01-29
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2020-01-29
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2020-01-30T10:13:35Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.dateFOA2020-02-10T10:37:51Z
refterms.panelBen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).