Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMoriarty, AS
dc.contributor.authorCoventry, PA
dc.contributor.authorHudson, JL
dc.contributor.authorCook, N
dc.contributor.authorFenton, OJ
dc.contributor.authorBower, P
dc.contributor.authorLovell, K
dc.contributor.authorArcher, J
dc.contributor.authorClarke, R
dc.contributor.authorRichards, DA
dc.contributor.authorDickens, C
dc.contributor.authorGask, L
dc.contributor.authorWaheed, W
dc.contributor.authorHuijbregts, KM
dc.contributor.authorvan der Feltz–Cornelis, C
dc.contributor.authorAli, S
dc.contributor.authorGilbody, S
dc.contributor.authorMcMillan, D
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-19T09:01:45Z
dc.date.issued2019-11-22
dc.description.abstractBackground: Relapse (the re-emergence of depression symptoms before full recovery) is common in depression and relapse prevention strategies are not well researched in primary care settings. Collaborative care is effective for treating acute phase depression but little is known about the use of relapse prevention strategies in collaborative care. We undertook a systematic review to identify and characterise relapse prevention strategies in the context of collaborative care. Methods: We searched for Randomised Controlled Trials (RCTs) of collaborative care for depression. In addition to published material, we obtained provider and patient manuals from authors to provide more detail on intervention content. We reported the extent to which collaborative care interventions addressed four relapse prevention components. Results: 93 RCTs were identified. 31 included a formal relapse prevention plan; 42 had proactive monitoring and follow-up after the acute phase; 39 reported strategies for optimising sustained medication adherence; and 20 of the trials reported psychological or psycho-educational treatments persisting beyond the acute phase or focussing on long-term health/relapse prevention. 30 (32.3%) did not report relapse prevention approaches. Limitations: We did not receive trial materials for approximately half of the trials, which limited our ability to identify relevant features of intervention content. Conclusion: Relapse is a significant risk amongst people treated for depression and interventions are needed that specifically address and minimise this risk. Given the advantages of collaborative care as a delivery system for depression care, there is scope for more consistency and increased effort to implement and evaluate relapse prevention strategies.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institute for Health Researchen_GB
dc.identifier.citationPublished online 22-November-2019en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jad.2019.11.105
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/40918
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherElsevieren_GB
dc.rights.embargoreasonUnder embargo until 22 November 2020 in compliance with publisher policyen_GB
dc.subjectCollaborative careen_GB
dc.subjectDepressionen_GB
dc.subjectRelapse preventionen_GB
dc.titleThe role of relapse prevention for depression in collaborative care: A systematic reviewen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2020-02-19T09:01:45Z
dc.identifier.issn0165-0327
dc.descriptionThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Elsevier via the DOI in this record en_GB
dc.identifier.journalJournal of Affective Disordersen_GB
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserveden_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2019-11-21
rioxxterms.versionAMen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2019-11-21
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2020-02-19T08:53:56Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.dateFOA2020-11-22T00:00:00Z
refterms.panelAen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record