Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMora, C
dc.contributor.authorAburto-Oropeza, O
dc.contributor.authorBocos, AA
dc.contributor.authorAyotte, PM
dc.contributor.authorBanks, S
dc.contributor.authorBauman, AG
dc.contributor.authorBeger, M
dc.contributor.authorBessudo, S
dc.contributor.authorBooth, DJ
dc.contributor.authorBrokovich, E
dc.contributor.authorBrooks, A
dc.contributor.authorChabanet, P
dc.contributor.authorCinner, JE
dc.contributor.authorCortés, J
dc.contributor.authorCruz-Motta, JJ
dc.contributor.authorMagaña, AC
dc.contributor.authorDeMartini, EE
dc.contributor.authorEdgar, GJ
dc.contributor.authorFeary, DA
dc.contributor.authorFerse, SCA
dc.contributor.authorFriedlander, AM
dc.contributor.authorGaston, Kevin J.
dc.contributor.authorGough, C
dc.contributor.authorGraham, Nicholas A.J.
dc.contributor.authorGreen, Alison
dc.contributor.authorGuzman, H
dc.contributor.authorHardt, M
dc.contributor.authorKulbicki, M
dc.contributor.authorLetourneur, Y
dc.contributor.authorPérez, AL
dc.contributor.authorLoreau, M
dc.contributor.authorLoya, Y
dc.contributor.authorMartinez, C
dc.contributor.authorMascareñas-Osorio, I
dc.contributor.authorMorove, T
dc.contributor.authorNadon, M-O
dc.contributor.authorNakamura, Y
dc.contributor.authorParedes, G
dc.contributor.authorPolunin, Nicholas V.C.
dc.contributor.authorPratchett, MS
dc.contributor.authorBonilla, HR
dc.contributor.authorRivera, F
dc.contributor.authorSala, E
dc.contributor.authorSandin, SA
dc.contributor.authorSoler, G
dc.contributor.authorStuart-Smith, R
dc.contributor.authorTessier, E
dc.contributor.authorTittensor, DP
dc.contributor.authorTupper, M
dc.contributor.authorUsseglio, P
dc.contributor.authorVigliola, L
dc.contributor.authorWantiez, L
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, I
dc.contributor.authorWilson, Shaun K.
dc.contributor.authorZapata, FA
dc.date.accessioned2013-06-07T09:28:05Z
dc.date.issued2011-04-05
dc.description.abstractDifficulties in scaling up theoretical and experimental results have raised controversy over the consequences of biodiversity loss for the functioning of natural ecosystems. Using a global survey of reef fish assemblages, we show that in contrast to previous theoretical and experimental studies, ecosystem functioning (as measured by standing biomass) scales in a non-saturating manner with biodiversity (as measured by species and functional richness) in this ecosystem. Our field study also shows a significant and negative interaction between human population density and biodiversity on ecosystem functioning (i.e., for the same human density there were larger reductions in standing biomass at more diverse reefs). Human effects were found to be related to fishing, coastal development, and land use stressors, and currently affect over 75% of the world's coral reefs. Our results indicate that the consequences of biodiversity loss in coral reefs have been considerably underestimated based on existing knowledge and that reef fish assemblages, particularly the most diverse, are greatly vulnerable to the expansion and intensity of anthropogenic stressors in coastal areas.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 9(4), article e1000606en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pbio.1000606
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/9906
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherPublic Library of Scienceen_GB
dc.titleGlobal human footprint on the linkage between biodiversity and ecosystem functioning in reef fishesen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2013-06-07T09:28:05Z
dc.identifier.issn1544-9173
dc.descriptionCopyright: © 2011 Mora et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.en_GB
dc.identifier.journalPLoS Biologyen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record