Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBaskerville, Rachel F.en_GB
dc.contributor.authorBeechey, Johnen_GB
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity of Exeter; Unitec, Auckland, New Zealanden_GB
dc.date.accessioned2008-01-15T10:25:34Zen_GB
dc.date.accessioned2011-01-25T10:16:13Zen_GB
dc.date.accessioned2013-03-19T15:43:22Z
dc.date.issued2007-06en_GB
dc.description.abstractThe objective of this research is to explore the impact of the failure of provision of clear and stable role definitions on performance-based compensation arrangements. A recent historical perspective on compensation agreements in CA partnerships revealed an unexpected instability, diversity, and a range in the roles undertaken by partners in CA firms. This report provides documentation of this instability, and suggests partnerships adopted performance- based compensation systems without consideration of the extent to which the success of such systems depended on stable role specificity. This research has implications for corporations where the interests of the entity may be best served when top management undertake diverse or previously unspecified roles and activities, on an ad-hoc or opportunistic basis.en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10036/16114en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.subjectaccountingen_GB
dc.subjectperformance-based compensationen_GB
dc.titleThe significance of role definition and specificity on performance-based compensation: the case of accounting partnershipsen_GB
dc.typePresentationen_GB
dc.date.available2008-01-15T10:25:34Zen_GB
dc.date.available2011-01-25T10:16:13Zen_GB
dc.date.available2013-03-19T15:43:22Z
dc.descriptionPresented to the Oxford Business and Economics Conference, June 2007en_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record