What is the spatial distribution of magnetic helicity injected in a solar active region?

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Open Research Exeter (ORE)

What is the spatial distribution of magnetic helicity injected in a solar active region?

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10036/19045


Title: What is the spatial distribution of magnetic helicity injected in a solar active region?
Author: Pariat, E.
Nindos, A.
Démoulin, P.
Berger, M.A.
Citation: 452 (2), pp. 623-630
Publisher: EDP Sciences
Journal: Astronomy and Astrophysics
Date Issued: 2006
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10036/19045
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20054643
Links: http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20054643
Abstract: Context. Magnetic helicity is suspected to play a key role in solar phenomena such as flares and coronal mass ejections. Several investigations have recently computed the photospheric flux of magnetic helicity in active regions. The derived spatial maps of the helicity flux density, called GA, have an intrinsic mixed-sign patchy distribution. Aims. Pariat et al. (2005) recently showed that GA is only a proxy of the helicity flux density, which tends to create spurious polarities. They proposed a better proxy, Gθ. We investigate here the implications of this new approach on observed active regions. Methods. The magnetic data are from MDI/SoHO instrument and the photospheric velocities are computed by local correlation tracking. Maps and temporal evolution of GA and Gθ are compared using the same data set for 5 active regions. Results. Unlike the usual GA maps, most of our Gθ maps show almost unipolar spatial structures because the nondominant helicity flux densities are significantly suppressed. In a few cases, the Gθ maps still contain spurious bipolar signals. With further modelling we infer that the real helicity flux density is again unipolar. On time-scales larger than their transient temporal variations, the time evolution of the total helicity fluxes derived from GA and Gθ show small differences. However, unlike GA, with Gθ the time evolution of the total flux is determined primarily by the predominant-signed flux while the nondominant-signed flux is roughly stable and probably mostly due to noise. Conclusions. Our results strongly support the conclusion that the spatial distribution of helicity injected into active regions is much more coherent than previously thought: on the active region scale the sign of the injected helicity is predominantly uniform. These results have implications for the generation of the magnetic field (dynamo) and for the physics of both flares and coronal mass ejections.
Type: Article
Description: Copyright © 2006 EDP Sciences. This article appeared in Astronomy & Astrophysics 452 (2006) and may be found at http://www.aanda.org/index.php?option=article&access=doi&doi=10.1051/0004-6361:20054643
Keywords: Sun: magnetic fieldsSun: photosphereSun: corona
ISSN: 0004-63611432-0746

Please note: Before reusing this item please check the rights under which it has been made available. Some items are restricted to non-commercial use. Please cite the published version where applicable.

Files in this item

Files Size Format View
magnetic helicity.pdf 1.480Mb PDF Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)


My Account

Local Links