Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHarris, Richard D. F.en_GB
dc.contributor.authorShen, Jianen_GB
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity of Exeteren_GB
dc.date.accessioned2008-07-04T09:36:41Zen_GB
dc.date.accessioned2011-01-25T10:16:21Zen_GB
dc.date.accessioned2013-03-19T15:44:08Z
dc.date.issued2003en_GB
dc.description.abstractWhen using derivative instruments such as futures to hedge a portfolio of risky assets, the primary objective is to estimate the optimal hedge ratio (OHR). When agents have mean-variance utility and the futures price follows a martingale, the OHR is equivalent to the minimum variance hedge ratio,which can be estimated by regressing the spot market return on the futures market return using ordinary least squares. To accommodate time-varying volatility in asset returns, estimators based on rolling windows, GARCH, or EWMA models are commonly employed. However, all of these approaches are based on the sample variance and covariance estimators of returns, which, while consistent irrespective of the underlying distribution of the data, are not in general efficient. In particular, when the distribution of the data is leptokurtic, as is commonly found for short horizon asset returns, these estimators will attach too much weight to extreme observations. This article proposes an alternative to the standard approach to the estimation of the OHR that is robust to the leptokurtosis of returns. We use the robust OHR to construct a dynamic hedging strategy for daily returns on the FTSE100 index using index futures. We estimate the robust OHR using both the rolling window approach and the EWMA approach, and compare our results to those based on the standard rolling window and EWMA estimators. It is shown that the robust OHR yields a hedged portfolio variance that is marginally lower than that based on the standard estimator. Moreover, the variance of the robust OHR is as much as 70% lower than the variance of the standard OHR, substantially reducing the transaction costs that are associated with dynamic hedging strategies.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Futures Markets, Vol. 23 ,Issue 8, p. 799 – 816en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/fut.10085en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10036/30954en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherWileyen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofseriesAccounting Working Papersen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofseries02/06en_GB
dc.relation.urlhttp://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/34434/homeen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.sobe.ex.ac.uk/accounting/papers/0206.pdfen_GB
dc.subjectOptimal hedge ratioen_GB
dc.subjectHedgingen_GB
dc.subjectRobust estimationen_GB
dc.subjectFuturesen_GB
dc.subjectFTSE 100en_GB
dc.subjectStock indexen_GB
dc.titleRobust estimation of the optimal hedge ratioen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2008-07-04T09:36:41Zen_GB
dc.date.available2011-01-25T10:16:21Zen_GB
dc.date.available2013-03-19T15:44:08Z
dc.identifier.issn0270-7314en_GB
dc.descriptionPre-print of the article was published in the Accounting Working Papers series (ISSN 1473 2920)en_GB
dc.identifier.eissn1096-9934
dc.identifier.journalJournal of Futures Marketsen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record