Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGregory, Alanen_GB
dc.contributor.authorWang, Yuan-Hsinen_GB
dc.date.accessioned2011-06-14T13:33:48Zen_GB
dc.date.accessioned2013-03-20T11:12:07Z
dc.date.issued2010-10en_GB
dc.description.abstractAlthough Jensen (1988) argues that high levels of free cash flow and unused borrowing capacity are likely to encourage low-value mergers, the “pecking order” theory offers a different perspective, where managers conserve cash flow to undertake positive NPV investments. We argue that the stronger position of shareholders, as opposed to firm managers, in the UK compared to the US makes the Free Cash Flow (FCF) hypothesis less likely to be relevant in the UK. In support of this, by analysing both announcement period and long term returns, we show that for a comprehensive sample of UK cash acquirers there is little support for the Free Cash Flow (FCF) hypothesis. Instead, our evidence is consistent with greater shareholder monitoring mitigating any agency problem associated with high FCF. Our results are also consistent with low FCF firms having a greater likelihood of being financially distressed.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 5 Iss: 1, pp.35 - 57
dc.identifier.doi10.1108/RBF-02-2013-0010
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10036/3133en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherUniversity of Exeteren_GB
dc.relation.ispartofseriesDiscussion paper no. 10/07en_GB
dc.subjectfree cash flowen_GB
dc.subjectshareholder monitoringen_GB
dc.subjectacquisitionsen_GB
dc.titleCash acquirers: free cash flow, shareholder monitoring, and shareholder returnsen_GB
dc.typeWorking Paperen_GB
dc.date.available2011-06-14T13:33:48Zen_GB
dc.date.available2013-03-20T11:12:07Z
dc.identifier.issn1940-5979
dc.date2013
dc.descriptionDiscussion paperen_GB
dc.identifier.journalReview of Behavioral Finance


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record