Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAl-Rawahi, Nuhaila Mohamed Saiden_GB
dc.date.accessioned2011-11-04T16:47:35Zen_GB
dc.date.accessioned2013-03-21T10:38:08Z
dc.date.issued2010-09-29en_GB
dc.description.abstractPaper One: Social and emotional literacy has become an educational agenda on a national and international level. Schools universally are addressing deviant behaviour through a social learning perspective. Emotional literacy (EL) reflects three of the five outcomes for “Every Child Matters: Change for Children” (DfES, 2003): to be healthy, to enjoy and achieve and to make a positive contribution. EI is also embedded in the legal framework for the associated reform that is set out in the Children Act (2004). The five outcomes for Every Child Matters are statutory demands on educational institutions and welfare services. Since EL is reflected in the outcomes, it suggests that it too needs to be addressed. However, schools have the flexibility in how they chose to address it. This study aims to evaluate a personalised approach in promoting EL in Key Stage Two (KS2) children in one primary school. A pre and post design was used to evaluate the school’s new approach (NA). Class teachers completed Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaires (SDQs) for 75 children pre-NA and post-NA. Statistical tests were used to: 1) Compare the pre SDQ scores to the post SDQ scores to determine whether the NA produced a significant change. 2) Determine where there was a significant difference between the research sample scores and the expected value scores according to the classification of the SDQ scores. 3) Compare the research sample SDQ scores to the SDQ scores from the norm data of the British population. Results of the statistical analysis suggest that the NA was effective as there was a significant improvement in the overall general behaviour according to the total difficulties scores. The statistical analysis revealed mixed results for the five scale scores. The hyperactivity scale, the peer problems scale and the emotional symptoms scale showed significant improvements. However, the pro social scale showed a significant decline and the conduct problems scale was the only scale that showed no significant difference between pre-NA and post- NA. Further tests conducted to strengthen the quality of the sample showed the pro social scale was in line with the British norms even with the significant decline. Similarly, the conduct problems scale was in line with the British norm post-NA. The research has produced encouraging statistics for the effectiveness of NA on the children’s behaviour, however, it calls for a re-evaluation of the NA in order to improve the pro social behaviour and lessen conduct problems. Section One Introduction 1.1 Purpose Personal, social and emotional development is as much a concern as academic development in children. Research suggests that social and emotional skills are needed to succeed in school (Thompson, 2002) to establish and sustain relationships, reduce aggressive behaviour (Nagin & Tremblay, 1999) and create an ideal learning and teaching environment. The objective of this research is to determine whether the school’s personalised EL programme (NA) produces favourable behavioural outcomes in children. Paper Two: Social and emotional literacy has become an educational agenda on a national and international level. Schools universally are addressing deviant behaviour through a social learning perspective. Emotional literacy (EL) reflects three of the five outcomes for “Every Child Matters: Change for Children” (DfES, 2003): to be healthy, to enjoy and achieve and to make a positive contribution. EI is also embedded in the legal framework for the associated reform that is set out in the Children Act (2004). The five outcomes for Every Child Matters are statutory demands on educational institutions and welfare services. Since EL is reflected in the outcomes, it suggests that it too needs to be addressed. However, schools have the flexibility in how they chose to address it. This study aims to evaluate a personalised approach in promoting EL in Key Stage Two (KS2) children in one primary school. A pre and post design was used to evaluate the school’s new approach (NA). Class teachers completed Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaires (SDQs) for 75 children pre-NA and post-NA. Statistical tests were used to: 1) Compare the pre SDQ scores to the post SDQ scores to determine whether the NA produced a significant change. 2) Determine where there was a significant difference between the research sample scores and the expected value scores according to the classification of the SDQ scores. 3) Compare the research sample SDQ scores to the SDQ scores from the norm data of the British population. Results of the statistical analysis suggest that the NA was effective as there was a significant improvement in the overall general behaviour according to the total difficulties scores. The statistical analysis revealed mixed results for the five scale scores. The hyperactivity scale, the peer problems scale and the emotional symptoms scale showed significant improvements. However, the pro social scale showed a significant decline and the conduct problems scale was the only scale that showed no significant difference between pre-NA and post- NA. Further tests conducted to strengthen the quality of the sample showed the pro social scale was in line with the British norms even with the significant decline. Similarly, the conduct problems scale was in line with the British norm post-NA. The research has produced encouraging statistics for the effectiveness of NA on the children’s behaviour, however, it calls for a re-evaluation of the NA in order to improve the pro social behaviour and lessen conduct problems.en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10036/3261en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherUniversity of Exeteren_GB
dc.subjectEmotional Literacyen_GB
dc.subjectEmotional Intelligenceen_GB
dc.subjectPromoting Alternative Thinking Strategiesen_GB
dc.subjectEmotional Literacy Programmesen_GB
dc.subjectTeacher Perceptionsen_GB
dc.subjectPersonalised emotional literacy programmesen_GB
dc.subjectEvaluation of personalised emotional programmeen_GB
dc.subjectteachers and emotional literacyen_GB
dc.subjectteachers' views on teaching emotional literacyen_GB
dc.titleEffective Emotional Literacy Programmes: Teachers' Perceptionsen_GB
dc.typeThesis or dissertationen_GB
dc.date.available2011-11-04T16:47:35Zen_GB
dc.date.available2013-03-21T10:38:08Z
dc.contributor.advisorMacleod, Floraen_GB
dc.contributor.advisorTunbridge, Margieen_GB
dc.publisher.departmentGraduate School of Educationen_GB
dc.relation.referencesCurtis,C., and Norgate,N. (2007). An Evaluation of the Promoting Alternative Strategies Curriculum at Key Stage 1. Educational Psychology in Practice, vol.23, pp.33-44.en_GB
dc.relation.referencesPerry, L., Lennie, C. & Humphrey, N. (2008) Emotional literacy in the primary classroom: teacher perceptions and practices. Education, 36 (1), 3-13.en_GB
dc.relation.referencesKelly,B., Longbottom, J., Potts, F. & Williamson, J. (2004). Applying Emotional Intelligence: Exploring the Promoting Alternative Thinking Strategies curriculum. Educational Psychology in Practice, 20 (3), 221-240.en_GB
dc.relation.referencesGreenberg, M.T., & Kusché, C.A. (1993). Promoting social and emotional development in deaf children: the PATHS project. Seattle: University of Washington Press.en_GB
dc.relation.referencesGreenberg, M.T., & Kusché, C.A (1998) Blue Prints for violence, Promoting Alternative Thinking Strategies (PATHS). Venture Publishing, Golden: Colorado.en_GB
dc.relation.referencesKam, C. M., Greenberg, M.T., & Walls, C. T. (2003). Examining the Role of Implementation Quality in School-Based Prevention Using the PATHS Curriculum. Prevention Science, 4, 55-63.en_GB
dc.relation.referencesMale, D. (2003). Challenging behaviour: the perceptions of teachers of children and young people with severe learning disabilities. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 3, 162-171.en_GB
dc.type.degreetitleDEdPsy in Educational, Child and Community Psychologyen_GB
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen_GB
dc.type.qualificationnameDEdPsyen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record