Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGrieger, Khara D.en_GB
dc.contributor.authorBaun, Andersen_GB
dc.contributor.authorOwen, Richarden_GB
dc.date.accessioned2012-02-28T12:01:27Zen_GB
dc.date.accessioned2013-03-19T16:02:43Z
dc.date.issued2010-02en_GB
dc.description.abstractChemical-based risk assessment underpins the current approach to responsible development of nanomaterials (NM). It is now recognised, however,that this process may take decades, leaving decision makers with little support in the near term. Despite this, current and near future research efforts are largely directed at establishing (eco)toxicological and exposure data for NM, and comparatively little research has been undertaken on tools or approaches that may facilitate near-term decisions, some of which we briefly outline in this analysis. We propose a reprioritisation of NM risk research efforts to redress this imbalance, including the development of more adaptive risk governance frameworks, alternative/ complementary tools to risk assessment, and health and environment surveillanceen_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 12, Issue 2, pp. 383 - 392en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11051-009-9829-1en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10036/3449en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherSpringeren_GB
dc.subjectNanotechnologyen_GB
dc.subjectNanomaterialsen_GB
dc.subjectResearch prioritiesen_GB
dc.subjectRisk assessmenten_GB
dc.subjectRisk governanceen_GB
dc.subjectSocietal implicationsen_GB
dc.titleRedefining risk research priorities for nanomaterialsen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2012-02-28T12:01:27Zen_GB
dc.date.available2013-03-19T16:02:43Z
dc.descriptionPublicly available through Springer Open Access © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009en_GB
dc.identifier.journalJournal of Nanoparticle Researchen_GB
dc.identifier.pmcidPMC2988212en_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record