Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorShaukat, Amamaen_GB
dc.date.accessioned2012-02-28T12:16:40Zen_GB
dc.date.accessioned2013-03-19T15:47:10Z
dc.date.issued2011en_GB
dc.description.abstractWhile prior studies treat non-executives as a homogenous group, this paper focuses on heterogeneity of this group. It examines the link between firm value and the specific characteristics of non-executives that render them non-independent (and by implication undesirable) as per the UK Code of Corporate Governance. It finds that contrary to the Code’s implications, the presence of past employees on the board, has an economically as well as statistically strong positive association with firm value. This result suggests that it is not just formal ‘independence’, but a combination of ‘independence of mind’ and ‘firmspecific’ knowledge that perhaps past employees best possess, that matters for enhancing effective board decision making and hence firm value. Moreover, only some of the other dimensions of directors’ non-independence are negatively associated with firm value. The results suggest that some of the Code recommendations regarding directors’ independence may actually not benefit shareholders.en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10036/3450en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.subjectcorporate governanceen_GB
dc.subjectboard of directorsen_GB
dc.subjectnon-executive directorsen_GB
dc.subjectindependent directorsen_GB
dc.titleAre all non-independent non-executive directors undesirable? Directors non-independence and firm value in UKen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2012-02-28T12:16:40Zen_GB
dc.date.available2013-03-19T15:47:10Z
dc.descriptionConference paper; submitted for publication as journal articleen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record