dc.description.abstract | Agit prop or agitational propaganda, as the very term implies, seeks to deliberately
change people’s beliefs through well-planned strategies of persuasion,
transformations of spectators into (spect)actors, and their subsequent mobilisation
into agitating communities. Theatre is one of the channels of the agit prop. The
emphasis on the deliberateness of the communication involved distinguishes this
form of theatre from other forms of political theatre and from mere conversation.
Many accusations have been levelled at agit prop theatre. Of these, the three
primary ones are, first, that such theatre lacks artistic viability; second, that it is
short-lived and works only in a certain historical context; and third, that it is only
propaganda, not theatre. This paper challenges these accusations by investigating
how agit prop theatre can evolve and undergo considerable artistic development
to survive as good theatre and not just as good propaganda. Although agit prop
does generally emerge in moments of crisis and in periods of revolutionary change,
this does not imply that its value is erased once the moment passes. A good agit
prop theatre company cannot, in fact, sustain itself on mere propaganda. As a case
study, the paper will examine the work of the British forty-two year old Red Ladder
Theatre Company. By examining in depth the specific aesthetic and dramaturgic
ingredients that Red Ladder uses to achieve its aims, this article will demonstrate
that artistic intent and application cannot be made subordinate to the
revolutionary message, at least not for long. | en_GB |