Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorColombetti, Giovannaen_GB
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity of Exeter. At the time of publication, the author was at the University of Trentoen_GB
dc.date.accessioned2009-01-27T11:27:33Zen_GB
dc.date.accessioned2011-01-25T10:54:36Zen_GB
dc.date.accessioned2013-03-20T15:55:28Z
dc.date.issued2005-08en_GB
dc.description.abstract‘Valence’ is used in many different ways in emotion theory. It generally refers to the ‘positive’ or ‘negative’ character of an emotion, as well as to the ‘positive’ or ‘negative’ character of some aspect of emotion. After reviewing these different uses, I point to the conceptual problems that come with them. In particular, I distinguish: problems that arise from conflating the valence of an emotion with the valence of its aspects, and problems that arise from the very idea that an emotion (and/or its aspects) can be divided into mutually exclusive opposites. The first group of problems does not question the classic dichotomous notion of valence, but the second does. In order to do justice to the richness of daily emotions, emotion science needs more complex conceptual tools.en_GB
dc.identifier.citation12(8-10), pp.103-126en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10036/48053en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherImprint Academicen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.imprint.co.uk/jcs_12_8.htmlen_GB
dc.subjectvalenceen_GB
dc.subjectemotion theoryen_GB
dc.subjectemotionsen_GB
dc.subjectfeelingsen_GB
dc.titleAppraising valenceen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2009-01-27T11:27:33Zen_GB
dc.date.available2011-01-25T10:54:36Zen_GB
dc.date.available2013-03-20T15:55:28Z
dc.identifier.issn1355-8250en_GB
dc.identifier.journalJournal of Consciousness Studiesen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record