dc.contributor.author | Colombetti, Giovanna | en_GB |
dc.contributor.department | University of Exeter | en_GB |
dc.date.accessioned | 2009-01-28T14:50:22Z | en_GB |
dc.date.accessioned | 2011-01-25T10:54:36Z | en_GB |
dc.date.accessioned | 2013-03-20T15:52:00Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2008-03 | en_GB |
dc.description.abstract | Damasio’s Somatic Marker Hypothesis (SMH) is a prominent neuroscientific hypothesis
about the mechanisms implementing decision-making. This paper argues that, since its
inception, the SMH has not been clearly formulated. It is possible to identify at least two different hypotheses, which make different predictions: SMH-G, which claims that somatic states generally implement preferences and are needed to make a decision; and SMH-S, which specifically claims that somatic states assist decision-making by anticipating the long-term outcomes of available options. This paper also argues that neither hypothesis is adequately supported empirically; the task originally proposed to test SMH is not a good test for SMH-S, and its results do not support SMH-G either. In addition, it is not clear how SMH-G could be empirically invalidated, given its general formulation. Suggestions are made that could help provide evidence for SMH-S, and make SMH-G more specific. | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | Cognitive Science Laboratory (Center
for Mind/Brain Sciences), University of Trento (Italy); Cognitive Neuropsychology Laboratory, Harvard University | en_GB |
dc.identifier.citation | 59(1), pp.51-71 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1093/bjps/axm045 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10036/48173 | en_GB |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | Oxford University Press | en_GB |
dc.relation.url | http://bjps.oxfordjournals.org/content/vol59/issue1/index.dtl | en_GB |
dc.relation.url | http://bjps.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/reprint/59/1/51 | en_GB |
dc.subject | Somatic Marker Hypothesis | en_GB |
dc.subject | SMH | en_GB |
dc.subject | neuroscience | en_GB |
dc.subject | decision-making | en_GB |
dc.subject | cognitive neuroscience | en_GB |
dc.subject | Damasio, Antonio | en_GB |
dc.subject | Iowa Gambling Task | en_GB |
dc.title | The Somatic Marker Hypotheses, and what the Iowa Gambling Task does and does not show | en_GB |
dc.type | Article | en_GB |
dc.date.available | 2009-01-28T14:50:22Z | en_GB |
dc.date.available | 2011-01-25T10:54:36Z | en_GB |
dc.date.available | 2013-03-20T15:52:00Z | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0007-0882 | en_GB |
dc.description | This is a pre-copy-editing, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in the British Journal for the Philosophy of Science following peer review. The definitive publisher-authenticated version (Vol.59(1), 2008, pp.51-71) is available online at: http://bjps.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/reprint/59/1/51. 24 month embargo by the publisher. Article will be released March 2010. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1464-3537 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.journal | British Journal for the Philosophy of Science | en_GB |