Seeing like the international community: how peacebuilding failed (and survived) in Tajikistan

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Open Research Exeter (ORE)

Seeing like the international community: how peacebuilding failed (and survived) in Tajikistan

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10036/58175

Share:                 



Title: Seeing like the international community: how peacebuilding failed (and survived) in Tajikistan
Author: Heathershaw, John
Citation: 2(3), pp.329-51
Publisher: Taylor & Francis
Journal: Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding
Date Issued: 2008-11
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10036/58175
DOI: 10.1080/17502970802436346
Links: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/titles/17502977.asp http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/content~content=a905596124~db=all~order=page
Abstract: The international community claims transformative power over post-conflict spaces via the concept of peacebuilding. International actors discursively make space for themselves in settings such as the Central Asian state of Tajikistan which endured a civil war during the 1990s and has only seen an end to widespread political violence in recent years. With the work of James C. Scott, this paper challenges the notion that post-conflict spaces are merely the objects of international intervention. It reveals how, even in cases of apparent stability such as that of Tajikistan, international actors fail to achieve their ostensible goals for that place yet make space for themselves in that place. International peacebuilders may provide essential resources for the re-emergence of local forms of order yet these symbolic and material resources are inevitably re-interpreted and re-appropriated by local actors to serve purposes which may be the opposite of their aims. However, despite this ‘failure’ of peacebuilding it nevertheless survives as a discursive construction through highly subjective processes of monitoring and evaluation. So maintained, peacebuilding is a constitutive element of world order where the necessity of intervention for humanitarian, democratic and statebuilding ends goes unchallenged. This raises the question of what or where – in spatial terms – is the locus of international intervention: the local recipients of peacebuilding programmes (who are the ostensible targets) or ‘the International Community’ itself (whose space is re-inscribed as that of an imperfect but necessary regulator of world order).
Type: Article
Description: Post-print version. 18 month embargo by the publisher. Article will be released April 2010.
Keywords: international communitypeacebuildingcivil societynon-governmental organisationshumanitarianismmonitoringevaluationTajikistanCentral Asia
ISSN: 1750-2977


Please note: Before reusing this item please check the rights under which it has been made available. Some items are restricted to non-commercial use. Please cite the published version where applicable.

Files in this item

Files Size Format View
Heathershaw 2008 PCSIR JISB_prepub.pdf 331.2Kb PDF Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Browse

My Account

Local Links