Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDunlop, Claire A.en_GB
dc.date.accessioned2009-06-15T13:22:04Zen_GB
dc.date.accessioned2011-01-25T11:44:02Zen_GB
dc.date.accessioned2013-03-20T16:31:37Z
dc.date.issued2000-09en_GB
dc.description.abstractThis article contests the understanding of Peter M. Haas's 'epistemic communities' approach, forwarded by David Toke in his article in Politics of May 1999. It is argued that while Toke diagnoses the approach's failing correctly, the cause he identifies is off the mark. This particularly concerns his assertion of a positivist dogma underscoring the thesis, which is rejected as a misinterpretation of Haas. Rather, it is contended that the framework's inability to engage with the real world of politics, and the other groups therein, is a product of its lack of theoretical refinement and rigorous empirical examination.en_GB
dc.identifier.citation20(3), pp.137-144en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/1467-9256.00123en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10036/70486en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishingen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttp://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/119041438/abstracten_GB
dc.relation.urlhttp://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/119041435/issueen_GB
dc.subjectepistemic communitiesen_GB
dc.titleEpistemic communities: a reply to Tokeen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2009-06-15T13:22:04Zen_GB
dc.date.available2011-01-25T11:44:02Zen_GB
dc.date.available2013-03-20T16:31:37Z
dc.identifier.issn0263-3957en_GB
dc.description© 2000 Political Studies Association and Blackwell Publishing Ltd. The definitive version is available at: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/118511092/homeen_GB
dc.identifier.eissn1467-9256
dc.identifier.journalPoliticsen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record