Into the Mouths of Babes: Hyperactivity, Food Additives and the History of the Feingold Diet

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Open Research Exeter (ORE)

Into the Mouths of Babes: Hyperactivity, Food Additives and the History of the Feingold Diet

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10036/77633

Share:                 



Title: Into the Mouths of Babes: Hyperactivity, Food Additives and the History of the Feingold Diet
Author: Smith, Matthew
Advisor: Jackson, Mark
Citation: Matthew Smith, ‘Into the Mouths of Babes: Hyperactivity, Food Additives and the Reception of the Feingold Diet’, in Mark Jackson (ed.) Health and the Modern Home (New York: Routledge, 2007), 304-21Matthew Smith, ‘Psychiatry Limited: Hyperactivity and the Evolution of American Psychiatry, 1957-1980’, Social History of Medicine Vol. 21, No. 3 (2008), 541-59 - www.shm.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/full/21/3/541
Publisher: University of Exeter
Date Issued: 2009-06-11
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10036/77633
Abstract: In 1974 Random House published a popular and controversial book entitled Why Your Child is Hyperactive. The author, San Francisco allergist Ben F. Feingold, claimed that hyperactivity was caused by food additives and was best prevented and treated with a diet, subsequently dubbed the ‘Feingold diet’, free of such substances. Reaction to the idea was swift. The media and parents found Feingold’s environmentally-based theory intriguing, as it provided an aetiological explanation for hyperactivity that was both sensible and topical. The medical community, in contrast, was suspicious and designed double-blind trials to test his theory. The dominant perception emerging out of these tests was that Feingold’s hypothesis was incorrect and, soon after Feingold’s death in 1982, medical and media attention faded away. Drawing on unpublished archival material, medical literature, popular media sources and oral history interviews, this thesis explores the rise and fall of the Feingold diet. It examines the origins of Feingold’s idea, the manner in which his theory was disseminated to the medical community and the broader public, and analyses how physicians and patients evaluated whether or not Feingold’s hypothesis was correct. Aiming to contribute to the histories of allergy, psychiatry and nutrition, the thesis contends that social factors, rather than scientific testing, were largely responsible for the fate of the Feingold diet. Some of these factors include Feingold’s methods and approach to describing and promoting his diet, the professional and economic interests of medical practitioners and the food, chemical and pharmaceutical industries, and the difficulties inherent in following the diet. From a broader historiographical perspective, the history of the Feingold diet suggests that in order to understand how medical controversies are resolved it is essential to analyse the historical context within which they emerge.
Type: Thesis or dissertation
Keywords: HistoryHyperactivityPsychiatryAllergyFoodChildhoodOral historyEnvironmental medicine
Funders/Sponsor: Wellcome Trust; Social Sciences and Humanities Council of Canada (SSHRC)
Grant Number: 080644/Z/06/Z/HB/HH (Wellcome Trust); 752-2006-0028 (SSHRC)


Please note: Before reusing this item please check the rights under which it has been made available. Some items are restricted to non-commercial use. Please cite the published version where applicable.

Files in this item

Files Size Format View
SmithM_fm.pdf 94.50Kb PDF Thumbnail
SmithM.pdf 1.957Mb PDF Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Browse

My Account

Local Links